Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31667356›Full record

ArticleWellcome open research2018

Social and economic impacts of congenital Zika syndrome in Brazil: Study protocol and rationale for a mixed-methods study.

Hannah Kuper, Tereza Maciel Lyra, Maria Elisabeth Lopes Moreira, Maria do Socorro Veloso de Albuquerque, Thália Velho Barreto de Araújo, Silke Fernandes, Mireia Jofre-Bonet, Heidi Larson, Ana Paula Lopes de Melo, Corina Helena Figueira Mendes and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wellcome open research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Congenital Zika Syndrome-Assessing the Need for a Family Support Programme in Brazil.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Hannah Kuper *International Centre for Evidence in Disability, Clinical Research Department, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8952-0023
Tereza Maciel Lyra *Aggeu Magalhães Institute, FIOCRUZ/PE, Recife, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3600-7250
Maria Elisabeth Lopes Moreira *Fernando Figueira Maternal and Children's Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2034-0294
Maria do Socorro Veloso de AlbuquerqueDepartment of Social Medicine, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.
Thália Velho Barreto de AraújoPostgraduate Programme in Public Health, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.
Silke FernandesFaculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7694-4233
Mireia Jofre-BonetDepartment of Economics, City University London, London, UK.
Heidi LarsonDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Ana Paula Lopes de MeloAggeu Magalhães Institute, FIOCRUZ/PE, Recife, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5572-0609
Corina Helena Figueira MendesFernando Figueira Maternal and Children's Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Martha Cristina Nunes MoreiraFernando Figueira Maternal and Children's Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7199-3797
Marcos Antonio Ferreira do NascimentoFernando Figueira Maternal and Children's Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3363-4232
Loveday Penn-KekanaDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Camila PimentelAggeu Magalhães Institute, FIOCRUZ/PE, Recife, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7511-9925
Marcia PintoFernando Figueira Maternal and Children's Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Clarissa SimasDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0035-8419
Sandra ValongueiroPostgraduate Programme in Public Health, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8532-5346
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco · BRFundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRCity, University of London · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global concern broke out in late 2015 as thousands of children in Brazil were born with microcephaly, which was quickly linked to congenital infection with Zika virus (ZIKV). ZIKV is now known to cause a wider spectrum of severe adverse outcomes-congenital Zika syndrome (CZS)-and also milder impairments. This study aimed to explore the social and economic impacts of CZS in Brazil. Data was collected through mixed methods across two settings: Recife City and Jaboatão dos Guararapes in Pernambuco State (the epicentre of the epidemic), and the city of Rio de Janeiro (where reports of ZIKV infection and CZS were less frequent). Data was collected May 2017-January 2018. Ethical standards were adhered to throughout the research. In-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with: mothers and other carers of children with CZS (approximately 30 per setting), pregnant women (10-12 per setting), men and women of child-bearing age (16-20 per setting), and health professionals (10-12 per setting). Thematic analysis was undertaken independently by researchers from at least two research settings, and these were shared for feedback. A case-control study was undertaken to quantitatively explore social and economic differences between caregivers of a child with CZS (cases) and caregivers with an unaffected child (controls). We aimed to recruit 100 cases and 100 controls per setting, from existing studies. The primary caregiver, usually the mother, was interviewed using a structured questionnaire to collect information on: depression, anxiety, stress, social support, family quality of life, health care and social service use, and costs incurred by families. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to compare outcomes for cases and controls. Costs incurred as a result of CZS were estimated from the perspective of the health system, families and society. Modelling was undertaken to estimate the total economic burden of CZS from those three perspectives.

Indexed as

AnxietyBrazilCongenital Zika SyndromeDepressionEconomicSocialZika

Identifiers

PMID31667356
PMCPMC6807146
OpenAlexW2893860182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.