Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31667164›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physics2018

Crowding Induces Entropically-Driven Changes to DNA Dynamics That Depend on Crowder Structure and Ionic Conditions.

Warren M Mardoum, Stephanie M Gorczyca, Kathryn E Regan, Tsai-Chin Wu, Rae M Robertson-Anderson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Melting Profile of DNA in Crowded Solution: Model-Based Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Warren M MardoumDepartment of Physics and Biophysics, University of San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.
Stephanie M GorczycaDepartment of Physics and Biophysics, University of San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.
Kathryn E ReganDepartment of Physics and Biophysics, University of San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.
Tsai-Chin WuDepartment of Physics and Biophysics, University of San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.
Rae M Robertson-AndersonDepartment of Physics and Biophysics, University of San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.

Funding

Biomimetic cytoskeleton and advanced microscopy to reveal intracellular DNA dynamics and distributionsR15GM123420 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO · PI MCGORTY, RYAN, ROBERTSON-ANDERSON, RAE MARIE · 2017 to 2022
$939k
NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM123420
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Macromolecular crowding plays a principal role in a wide range of biological processes including gene expression, chromosomal compaction, and viral infection. However, the impact that crowding has on the dynamics of nucleic acids remains a topic of debate. To address this problem, we use single-molecule fluorescence microscopy and custom particle-tracking algorithms to investigate the impact of varying macromolecular crowding conditions on the transport and conformational dynamics of large DNA molecules. Specifically, we measure the mean-squared center-of-mass displacements, as well as the conformational size, shape, and fluctuations, of individual 115 kbp DNA molecules diffusing through various

Indexed as

depletion interactionsDNA compactionDNA conformationDNA diffusionentropic forcesfluorescence microscopymacromolecular crowdingsingle-molecule tracking

Identifiers

PMID31667164
PMCPMC6820857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.