Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31667142›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2019

Evaluation of intratumoral heterogeneity by using diffusion kurtosis imaging and stretched exponential diffusion-weighted imaging in an orthotopic hepatocellular carcinoma xenograft model.

Ran Guo, Shuo-Hui Yang, Fang Lu, Zhi-Hong Han, Xu Yan, Cai-Xia Fu, Meng-Long Zhao, Jiang Lin

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Ran GuoDepartment of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Shuo-Hui YangDepartment of Radiology, Shuguang Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 200021, China.
Fang LuDepartment of Radiology, Shuguang Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 200021, China.
Zhi-Hong HanDepartment of Pathology, Shuguang Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 200021, China.
Xu YanMR Scientific Marketing, Siemens Healthcare, Shanghai 201318, China.
Cai-Xia FuSiemens Shenzhen Magnetic Resonance Ltd., Shenzhen 518057, China.
Meng-Long ZhaoDepartment of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Jiang LinDepartment of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Shuguang Hospital · CNSiemens (China) · CNShanghai Institute of Hematology · CNShanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNSun Yat-sen University · CNZhongshan Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo investigate the value of diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with a stretched exponential model (SEM) in the evaluation of tumor heterogeneity in an orthotopic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) xenograft model.

methodsThirty orthotopic HCC xenograft nude mice models were established and randomly divided into two groups, the sorafenib induction group (n=15) and control group (n=15). Every mouse in each group underwent MRI with DKI and SEM on a 1.5T MR scanner at 7, 14, and 21 days after sorafenib intervention. DKI and SEM parameters including mean kurtosis (MK), mean diffusivity (MD), α, and distributed diffusion coefficient (DDC) were measured, calculated, and compared between the two groups and among different time points. Sequential correlations between histopathological results including necrotic fraction (NF), micro-vessel density (MVD), Ki-67 index, standard deviation (SD), and kurtosis from hematoxylin-eosin staining, and DKI and SEM parameters were analyzed.

resultsMK, MD, and DDC of HCC in the sorafenib induction group were significantly higher than those in the control group at each time point (P<0.05), while α was significantly lower (P<0.05). Significantly positive correlations were found between MK and NF (r=0.693, P=0.010), SD (r =0.785, P=0.003), kurtosis (r=0.779, P=0.003), between MD and NF (r=0.794, P=0.003), SD (r=0.629, P=0.020), kurtosis (r=0.645, P=0.018), and between DDC and NF (r=0.800, P=0.003), SD (r=0.636, P=0.020), kurtosis (r=0.664, P=0.016), and significantly negative correlations were observed between α and NF (r=-0.704, P=0.009), SD (r=-0.754, P=0.003), and kurtosis (r=-0.792, P=0.003) in the sorafenib induction group.

conclusionsDKI and SEM parameters may be potentially useful for evaluating intratumoral heterogeneity in HCC.

Indexed as

diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI)hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)magnetic resonance imagingstretched exponential model (SEM)Tumor heterogeneity

Identifiers

PMID31667142
PMCPMC6785506
OpenAlexW2975350502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.