ArticleMethodsX2019
A new model for standardising and treating thermal injury in the rat.
Article in MethodsX, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Stem Cell-Based Tissue Engineering for the Treatment of Burn Wounds: A Systematic Review of Preclinical Studies.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2022Pooled it
- Article
- Systemic inflammation following traumatic injury and its impact on neuroinflammatory gene expression in the rodent brain.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2024Article
- Complex Hippocampal Response to Thermal Skin Injury and Protocols with Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy andInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Lung Protection After Severe Thermal Burns With Adenosine, Lidocaine, and Magnesium (ALM) Resuscitation and Importance of Shams in a Rat Model.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2024Article
- Establishment of a Bama miniature pig burn model with different burn depths.Gland surgery · 2022Article
- Carotid smooth muscle contractility changes after severe burn.Scientific reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Thermal burn injury methodologies are inconsistently described within the current literature. To permit the advancement of new treatments there is an urgent need for the development and standardisation of an acute rat model. We describe a rat thermal burn model that involves: anaesthesia, chronic catheterisation, skin preparation, baseline hemodynamic and physiological monitoring, and a quantifiable method to reproduce a severe full-thickness burns injury affecting ∼30% percent of the total body surface area (%TBSA). Following a 15 min post-burn period, treatment commences with an acute monitoring phase lasting up to 8 h, which can be modified according to individual protocols. This model reflects the clinical continuum-of-care from point-of-injury, a 15 min ambulance response time, a 60 min prehospital phase and hospital treatment monitoring phase. The model is validated with histological evidence of full-thickness injury, evidence of the hypermetabolic response (K+, Base Excess, lactate) and changes in complete blood counts. •It has been 50 years since Walker and Mason published their widely popular "A Standard Animal Burn Model".•The model, however, lacks quantifiable methodology for the assessment of burn thickness, surface area burnt and physiological status.•We present a new standardised method for evaluation of drug and interventional therapies that mimic the clinical scenario including ambulance response, pre-hospital and hospital phases after burn.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.