Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31667099›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2019

A new model for standardising and treating thermal injury in the rat.

Lisa Davenport, Geoffrey Dobson, Hayley Letson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lisa DavenportHeart, Trauma & Sepsis Research Laboratory, College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, 4811, Australia.
Geoffrey DobsonHeart, Trauma & Sepsis Research Laboratory, College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, 4811, Australia.
Hayley LetsonHeart, Trauma & Sepsis Research Laboratory, College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, 4811, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thermal burn injury methodologies are inconsistently described within the current literature. To permit the advancement of new treatments there is an urgent need for the development and standardisation of an acute rat model. We describe a rat thermal burn model that involves: anaesthesia, chronic catheterisation, skin preparation, baseline hemodynamic and physiological monitoring, and a quantifiable method to reproduce a severe full-thickness burns injury affecting ∼30% percent of the total body surface area (%TBSA). Following a 15 min post-burn period, treatment commences with an acute monitoring phase lasting up to 8 h, which can be modified according to individual protocols. This model reflects the clinical continuum-of-care from point-of-injury, a 15 min ambulance response time, a 60 min prehospital phase and hospital treatment monitoring phase. The model is validated with histological evidence of full-thickness injury, evidence of the hypermetabolic response (K+, Base Excess, lactate) and changes in complete blood counts. •It has been 50 years since Walker and Mason published their widely popular "A Standard Animal Burn Model".•The model, however, lacks quantifiable methodology for the assessment of burn thickness, surface area burnt and physiological status.•We present a new standardised method for evaluation of drug and interventional therapies that mimic the clinical scenario including ambulance response, pre-hospital and hospital phases after burn.

Indexed as

BurnsPrehospitalRat modelSevere thermal injury in the rat for evaluation of acute resuscitationThermal injury

Identifiers

PMID31667099
PMCPMC6812329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.