Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31667088›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife2019

Morphological and molecular characteristics of seven

Niichiro Abe, Kayoko Matsuo, Junji Moribe, Yasuhiro Takashima, Takao Irie, Takashi Baba, Bjørn Gjerde

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. European Pine Marten (Veterinary sciences · 2025
    Article
  2. First Report ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. The Role of Birds of the Family Corvidae in TransmittingAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Niichiro AbeDivision of Microbiology, Osaka Institute of Public Health, 8-34 Tojo-cho, Tennoji-ku, Osaka, 543-0026, Japan.
Kayoko MatsuoHida Regional Livestock Hygiene Service Center, 7-468 Kamiokamoto-machi, Takayama, Gifu, 506-8688, Japan.
Junji MoribeResearch Center for Wildlife Management, Faculty of Applied Biological Science, Gifu University, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu, 501-1193, Japan.
Yasuhiro TakashimaDepartment of Veterinary Parasitological Diseases, Faculty of Applied Biological Science, Gifu University, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu, 501-1193, Japan.
Takao IrieDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Hokkaido Institute of Public Health, North 19, West 12, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-0819, Japan.
Takashi BabaDivision of Microbiology, Osaka Institute of Public Health, 8-34 Tojo-cho, Tennoji-ku, Osaka, 543-0026, Japan.
Bjørn GjerdeFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Food Safety and Infection Biology, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, P.O. Box 369 Sentrum, 0102, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Samples of diaphragm were collected from 53 sika deer from Gifu Prefecture, Japan; 220 sarcocysts were isolated, examined in wet mounts and classified according to their cyst wall protrusions. The sarcocysts were then examined molecularly in order to assign them to different species. All but 11 of the 220 sarcocysts were initially identified by means of a multiplex PCR assay targeting

Indexed as

18S ribosomal RNA geneCervus nippon centralisCytochrome c oxidase subunit I geneJapanSarcocystis gjerdeiSarcocystis japonicaSarcocystis matsuoae

Identifiers

PMID31667088
PMCPMC6812019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.