Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31667023›Full record

ArticleApplications in plant sciences2019

An empirical assessment of a single family-wide hybrid capture locus set at multiple evolutionary timescales in Asteraceae.

Katy E Jones, Tomáš Fér, Roswitha E Schmickl, Rebecca B Dikow, Vicki A Funk, Sonia Herrando-Moraira, Paul R Johnston, Norbert Kilian, Carolina M Siniscalchi, Alfonso Susanna and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applications in plant sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Phylogenomics ofFrontiers in plant science · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Katy E JonesBotanischer Garten und Botanisches Museum Berlin Freie Universität Berlin Königin-Luise-Str. 6-8 14195 Berlin Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3728-0408
Tomáš FérDepartment of Botany Faculty of Science Charles University Benátská 2 CZ 12800 Prague Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0126-3684
Roswitha E SchmicklDepartment of Botany Faculty of Science Charles University Benátská 2 CZ 12800 Prague Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0632-5143
Rebecca B DikowData Science Lab Office of the Chief Information Officer Smithsonian Institution Washington D.C. 20013-7012 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9668-3683
Vicki A FunkDepartment of Botany National Museum of Natural History Smithsonian Institution Washington D.C. 20013-7012 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7975-1450
Sonia Herrando-MorairaBotanic Institute of Barcelona (IBB-CSIC-ICUB) Pg. del Migdia s.n. ES 08038 Barcelona Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0488-5112
Paul R JohnstonFreie Universität Berlin Evolutionary Biology Berlin Germany.
Norbert KilianBotanischer Garten und Botanisches Museum Berlin Freie Universität Berlin Königin-Luise-Str. 6-8 14195 Berlin Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0890-4373
Carolina M SiniscalchiDepartment of Biological Sciences University of Memphis Memphis Tennessee 38152 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3349-5081
Alfonso SusannaBotanic Institute of Barcelona (IBB-CSIC-ICUB) Pg. del Migdia s.n. ES 08038 Barcelona Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4717-9063
Marek SlovákDepartment of Botany Faculty of Science Charles University Benátská 2 CZ 12800 Prague Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9917-3099
Ramhari ThapaDepartment of Biological Sciences University of Memphis Memphis Tennessee 38152 USA.
Linda E WatsonDepartment of Plant Biology, Ecology, and Evolution Oklahoma State University Stillwater Oklahoma 74078 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6098-779X
Jennifer R MandelDepartment of Biological Sciences University of Memphis Memphis Tennessee 38152 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3539-2991

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

premiseHybrid capture with high-throughput sequencing (Hyb-Seq) is a powerful tool for evolutionary studies. The applicability of an Asteraceae family-specific Hyb-Seq probe set and the outcomes of different phylogenetic analyses are investigated here.

methodsHyb-Seq data from 112 Asteraceae samples were organized into groups at different taxonomic levels (tribe, genus, and species). For each group, data sets of non-paralogous loci were built and proportions of parsimony informative characters estimated. The impacts of analyzing alternative data sets, removing long branches, and type of analysis on tree resolution and inferred topologies were investigated in tribe Cichorieae.

resultsAlignments of the Asteraceae family-wide Hyb-Seq locus set were parsimony informative at all taxonomic levels. Levels of resolution and topologies inferred at shallower nodes differed depending on the locus data set and the type of analysis, and were affected by the presence of long branches. DISCUSSION: The approach used to build a Hyb-Seq locus data set influenced resolution and topologies inferred in phylogenetic analyses. Removal of long branches improved the reliability of topological inferences in maximum likelihood analyses. The Astereaceae Hyb-Seq probe set is applicable at multiple taxonomic depths, which demonstrates that probe sets do not necessarily need to be lineage-specific.

Indexed as

AsteraceaeCompositaehybrid captureHyb‐Seqnon‐paralogyphylogenetics

Identifiers

PMID31667023
PMCPMC6814182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.