Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31666860›Full record

ArticleOpen access Macedonian journal of medical sciences2019

Effectiveness of a Training Course on Accuracy of Triaging of Pediatric Patients.

Mona A Azzam, Enas F Elngar, Ayman A Gobarah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mona A AzzamPediatric Department, Faculty of Medicine Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt.
Enas F ElngarPediatric Department, Faculty of Medicine Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt.
Ayman A GobarahPediatric Department, Faculty of Medicine Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the context of a new but busy Pediatric Emergency Department, the risk of missing patients who need more emergent care can be reduced by timely and accurate triaging. In the emergency department of King Fahad Armed Forces Hospital, the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale had already been implemented, including the pediatric version (PaedCTAS). However, a common observation remained that critical patients did not always receive priority with subsequent delays in management. To improve this accuracy, a training course was administered to health care professionals responsible for triaging of pediatric patients.

aimTo determine the effectiveness of a training course on accuracy of triaging of Pediatric Patients.

methodsA triage training course was conducted over two months, with patient encounter sheets reviewed before the course for 6 months and after the course for 12 months. Accuracy was calculated by comparing it to level as determined by two pediatric emergency physicians. Also, admission rates were used as a surrogate marker to also determine accuracy.

resultsA total of 31 053 patient sheets were reviewed. There was a considerable improvement in the correct determination of all triage levels, with accuracy ranging from 56.5% to 78.3% before the course, and reaching from 79.1% to 90.8% after the course with a statistically significant difference. Triaging errors still present were mainly in the form of down-triage.

conclusionOur training course in triage has a significant impact on the accuracy of triaging of ill pediatric patients. Further improvement can be obtained by repeated courses and direct feedback with debriefing sessions on challenges to triage level determination.

Indexed as

Pediatric emergencyTriaging system

Identifiers

PMID31666860
PMCPMC6814480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.