Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31666821›Full record

ReviewJournal of medicine and life

Tissue Engineering; Current Status & Futuristic Scope.

Preeti Sharma, Pradeep Kumar, Rachna Sharma, Vijaya Dhar Bhatt, P S Dhot

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of medicine and life. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Application of pulsed electric field technology to skin engineering.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Preeti SharmaDepartment of Biochemistry, Santosh Medical College and Hospital (Santosh University), Ghaziabad, UP, India.
Pradeep KumarDepartment of Biochemistry, Santosh Medical College and Hospital (Santosh University), Ghaziabad, UP, India.
Rachna SharmaDepartment of Biochemistry, TSM Medical College and Hospital, Lucknow, UP, India.
Vijaya Dhar BhattDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Santosh Dental College and Hospital, Ghaziabad, UP, India.
P S DhotDepartment of Pathology, Santosh Medical College and Hospital, Ghaziabad, UP, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Almost 30 years have passed since the term 'tissue engineering' was created to represent a new concept that focuses on the regeneration of neotissues from cells with the support of biomaterials and growth factors. This interdisciplinary engineering has attracted much attention as a new therapeutic means that may overcome the drawbacks involved in the current artificial organs and organ transplantation that have also been aiming at replacing lost or severely damaged tissues or organs. However, the tissues regenerated by tissue engineering and widely applied to patients are still minimal, including skin, bone, cartilage, capillary, and periodontal tissues. What are the reasons for such slow advances in clinical applications of tissue engineering? This article gives a brief overview of the current state of tissue engineering, covering the fundamentals and applications. The fundamentals of tissue engineering involve cell sources, scaffolds for cell expansion and differentiation, as well as carriers for growth factors. Animal and human trials are a major part of the applications. Based on these results, some critical problems to be resolved for the advances of tissue engineering are addressed from the engineering point of view, emphasizing the close collaboration between medical doctors and biomaterials scientists.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsEmbryonic Stem CellsExtracellular MatrixHumansTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsBiocompatible Materialsin born errorneonatestissue engeneering

Identifiers

PMID31666821
PMCPMC6814873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.