ArticleScientific reports2019
Spectroscopic monitoring of transport processes during loading of ovarian tissue with cryoprotective solutions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cryopreservation and In Vitro Culture of Isolated Porcine Ovarian Follicles.Veterinary sciences · 2026Article
- Principles Underlying Cryopreservation and Freeze-Drying of Cells.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Review
- Mass Transfer in Cryopreservation at Multiple Scales: Cells, Tissues, and Organs.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Review
- Diffusion kinetics and perfusion times in tissue models obtained by bioorthogonal RamanBiophysical reports · 2024Article
- General tissue mass transfer model for cryopreservation applications.Biophysical journal · 2021Article
- Principles Underlying Cryopreservation and Freeze-Drying of Cells and Tissues.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is an increasing demand for female fertility preservation. Cryopreservation of ovarian cortex tissue by means of vitrification can be done ad-hoc and for pre-pubertal individuals. Obtaining a homogeneous distribution of protective agents in tissues is one of the major hurdles for successful preservation. Therefore, to rationally design vitrification strategies for tissues, it is needed to determine permeation kinetics of cryoprotective agents; to ensure homogeneous distribution while minimizing exposure time and toxicity effects. In this study, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) was used to monitor diffusion of different components into porcine ovarian cortex tissue. Water fluxes and permeation kinetics of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), glycerol (GLY), ethylene glycol (EG), and propylene glycol (PG) were investigated. Diffusion coefficients derived from FTIR data, were corroborated with differential scanning calorimetry and osmometer measurements. FTIR allowed real-time spectral fingerprinting of tissue during loading with mixtures of protective agents, while discriminating between different components and water. Exposure to vitrification solutions was found to cause drastic initial weight losses, which could be correlated with spectral features. Use of heavy water allowed distinguishing water fluxes associated with dehydration and permeation, both of which were found to precede permeation of cryoprotective agents. Overall, DMSO and EG were found to permeate faster than GLY and PG. In mixtures, however, solutes behave differently. The non-invasive spectroscopic method described here to study permeation of vitrification solution components into ovarian tissue can be applied to many other types of engineered constructs, tissues, and possibly organs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.