Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31666539›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Volume explored by a branching random walk on general graphs.

Ignacio Bordeu, Saoirse Amarteifio, Rosalba Garcia-Millan, Benjamin Walter, Nanxin Wei, Gunnar Pruessner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Entropy Production in Exactly Solvable Systems.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ignacio BordeuDepartment of Mathematics, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK. ib443@cam.ac.uk.
Saoirse AmarteifioDepartment of Mathematics, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
Rosalba Garcia-MillanDepartment of Mathematics, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
Benjamin WalterDepartment of Mathematics, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
Nanxin WeiDepartment of Mathematics, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
Gunnar PruessnerDepartment of Mathematics, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK. g.pruessner@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4704-9632

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Branching processes are used to model diverse social and physical scenarios, from extinction of family names to nuclear fission. However, for a better description of natural phenomena, such as viral epidemics in cellular tissues, animal populations and social networks, a spatial embedding-the branching random walk (BRW)-is required. Despite its wide range of applications, the properties of the volume explored by the BRW so far remained elusive, with exact results limited to one dimension. Here we present analytical results, supported by numerical simulations, on the scaling of the volume explored by a BRW in the critical regime, the onset of epidemics, in general environments. Our results characterise the spreading dynamics on regular lattices and general graphs, such as fractals, random trees and scale-free networks, revealing the direct relation between the graphs' dimensionality and the rate of propagation of the viral process. Furthermore, we use the BRW to determine the spectral properties of real social and metabolic networks, where we observe that a lack of information of the network structure can lead to differences in the observed behaviour of the spreading process. Our results provide observables of broad interest for the characterisation of real world lattices, tissues, and networks.

Identifiers

PMID31666539
PMCPMC6821755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.