Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31666437›Full record

ArticleJournal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis2020

High sdLDL Cholesterol can be Used to Reclassify Individuals with Low Cardiovascular Risk for Early Intervention: Findings from the Chinese Multi-Provincial Cohort Study.

Yue Qi, Jing Liu, Wei Wang, Miao Wang, Fan Zhao, Jiayi Sun, Jun Liu, Qiuju Deng, Dong Zhao

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Yue QiDepartment of Epidemiology, Beijing An Zhen Hospital, Capital Medical University; Beijing Institute of Heart, Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases; The Key Laboratory of Remodeling-related Cardiovascular Diseases, Ministry of Education; Beijing Municipal Key Laboratory of Clinical Epidemiology.
Jing LiuDepartment of Epidemiology, Beijing An Zhen Hospital, Capital Medical University; Beijing Institute of Heart, Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases; The Key Laboratory of Remodeling-related Cardiovascular Diseases, Ministry of Education; Beijing Municipal Key Laboratory of Clinical Epidemiology.
Wei WangDepartment of Epidemiology, Beijing An Zhen Hospital, Capital Medical University; Beijing Institute of Heart, Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases; The Key Laboratory of Remodeling-related Cardiovascular Diseases, Ministry of Education; Beijing Municipal Key Laboratory of Clinical Epidemiology.
Miao WangDepartment of Epidemiology, Beijing An Zhen Hospital, Capital Medical University; Beijing Institute of Heart, Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases; The Key Laboratory of Remodeling-related Cardiovascular Diseases, Ministry of Education; Beijing Municipal Key Laboratory of Clinical Epidemiology.
Fan ZhaoDepartment of Epidemiology, Beijing An Zhen Hospital, Capital Medical University; Beijing Institute of Heart, Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases; The Key Laboratory of Remodeling-related Cardiovascular Diseases, Ministry of Education; Beijing Municipal Key Laboratory of Clinical Epidemiology.
Jiayi SunDepartment of Epidemiology, Beijing An Zhen Hospital, Capital Medical University; Beijing Institute of Heart, Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases; The Key Laboratory of Remodeling-related Cardiovascular Diseases, Ministry of Education; Beijing Municipal Key Laboratory of Clinical Epidemiology.
Jun LiuDepartment of Epidemiology, Beijing An Zhen Hospital, Capital Medical University; Beijing Institute of Heart, Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases; The Key Laboratory of Remodeling-related Cardiovascular Diseases, Ministry of Education; Beijing Municipal Key Laboratory of Clinical Epidemiology.
Qiuju DengDepartment of Epidemiology, Beijing An Zhen Hospital, Capital Medical University; Beijing Institute of Heart, Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases; The Key Laboratory of Remodeling-related Cardiovascular Diseases, Ministry of Education; Beijing Municipal Key Laboratory of Clinical Epidemiology.
Dong ZhaoDepartment of Epidemiology, Beijing An Zhen Hospital, Capital Medical University; Beijing Institute of Heart, Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases; The Key Laboratory of Remodeling-related Cardiovascular Diseases, Ministry of Education; Beijing Municipal Key Laboratory of Clinical Epidemiology.
Ministry of Education · ROCapital Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimA high-risk strategy has been implemented for lipid-lowering therapy in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. However, atherosclerosis and cardiovascular events are common among individuals with low cardiovascular risk. This study aimed to determine whether the small dense low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (sdLDLC) level can predict carotid atherosclerosis progression and identify high-risk individuals.

methodsBaseline sdLDLC and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLC) were measured in 808 participants from the Chinese Multi-provincial Cohort Study, aged 45-74 years. Adjusted relative risk was calculated using a modified Poisson regression model to assess the relationship between sdLDLC and 5-year atherosclerosis progression, as indicated by the progression, incidence, and multi-territorial extent of carotid plaque.

resultsThe 5-year atherosclerosis progression increased significantly with increased sdLDLC. Baseline sdLDLC was significantly associated with the short-term risk of plaque progression after multivariable adjustment, even in participants with low LDLC or a 10-year estimated cardiovascular risk. sdLDLC predicted plaque progression (relative risk 2.05; 95% confidence interval 1.43-2.93) in participants with LDLC <130 mg/dL. Furthermore, participants with the highest sdLDLC but intermediate or low cardiovascular risk (accounting for 16% of the cohort) had double the risk of plaque progression, which was comparable to those with the same sdLDLC and high cardiovascular risk, relative to those with the lowest sdLDLC levels and low cardiovascular risk.

conclusionssdLDLC is independently associated with the progression of carotid atherosclerosis, which may provide a basis for clinicians to reclassify individuals believed to be at low cardiovascular risk into the high-risk category, and those with high sdLDLC may benefit from more aggressive cholesterol-lowering treatment.

Indexed as

AtherosclerosisCardiovascular DiseasesCholesterol, LDLHypercholesterolemiaAgedCentrifugation, Density GradientChinaDisease ProgressionEarly Medical InterventionFemaleHeart Disease Risk FactorsHumansHypolipidemic AgentsIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedCholesterol, LDLHypolipidemic AgentsCarotid atherosclerosisCommunity-based cohort studyHigh-risk strategyRisk reclassificationSmall dense low-density lipoprotein cholesterol

Identifiers

PMID31666437
PMCPMC7406409
OpenAlexW3003332631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.