Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31666365›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2019

Screening for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection by Use of a Fourth-Generation Antigen/Antibody Assay and Dried Blood Spots: In-Depth Analysis of Sensitivity and Performance Assessment in a Cross-Sectional Study.

Karl Stefic, Jerome Guinard, Gilles Peytavin, Leïla Saboni, Cécile Sommen, Claire Sauvage, Florence Lot, Syria Laperche, Annie Velter, Francis Barin

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Karl SteficCentre National de Référence du VIH, Laboratoire Associé, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Bretonneau, Tours, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9686-9194
Jerome GuinardCentre National de Référence du VIH, Laboratoire Associé, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Bretonneau, Tours, France.
Gilles PeytavinAPHP, Laboratoire de Pharmacologie-Toxicologie et IAME, Inserm UMR 1137, Université Paris 7, Paris, France.
Leïla SaboniSanté Publique France, Saint-Maurice, France.
Cécile SommenSanté Publique France, Saint-Maurice, France.
Claire SauvageSanté Publique France, Saint-Maurice, France.
Florence LotSanté Publique France, Saint-Maurice, France.
Syria LapercheDépartement des Agents Transmissibles par le Sang, Centre National de Référence Risques Infectieux Transfusionnels, Institut National de La Transfusion Sanguine, Paris, France.
Annie VelterSanté Publique France, Saint-Maurice, France.
Francis BarinCentre National de Référence du VIH, Laboratoire Associé, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Bretonneau, Tours, France francis.barin@univ-tours.fr.ORCID 0000-0003-4148-6900
Santé Publique France · FRUniversité de Tours · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours · FRInserm · FRInstitut National de la Transfusion Sanguine · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We evaluated the performance of a fourth-generation antigen/antibody (Ag/Ab) assay for detecting HIV-1 infection on dried blood spots (DBS) both in a conventional laboratory environment and in an epidemiological survey corresponding to a real-life situation. Although a 2-log loss of sensitivity compared to that with plasma was observed when using DBS in an analytical analysis, the median delay of positivity between DBS and crude serum during the early phase postacute infection was 7 days. The performance of the fourth-generation assay on DBS was approximately similar to that of a third-generation (antibody only) assay using crude serum samples. Among 2,646 participants of a cross-sectional study in a population of men having sex with men, 428 DBS were found reactive, but negative results were obtained from 5 DBS collected from individuals who self-reported a positive HIV status, confirmed by detection of antiretroviral (ARV) drugs in their DBS. The data generated allowed us to estimate a sensitivity of 98.8% of the fourth-generation assay/DBS strategy in a high-risk population, even including a broad majority of individuals on ARV treatment among those HIV positive. Our study brings additional proofs that DBS testing using a fourth-generation immunoassay is a reliable strategy able to provide alternative approaches for both individual HIV testing and surveillance of various populations.

Indexed as

Dried Blood Spot TestingHIVImmunoassayAnti-HIV AgentsCross-Sectional StudiesHIV AntibodiesHIV AntigensHIV InfectionsHumansReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySeroconversionAnti-HIV AgentsHIV AntibodiesHIV AntigensDBShuman immunodeficiency virus

Identifiers

PMID31666365
PMCPMC6935938
OpenAlexW2983035062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.