ArticleNeurology2019
Implementation of quality measures and patient-reported outcomes in an epilepsy clinic.
Article in Neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Introduction to Quantitative Aspects of Quality Improvement Science.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2025Article
- Enhancing Value and Well-Being: The Basket of Motivators Framework for Aligning Neurology Clinical Practices With Performance Outcomes.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2024Review
- Inequities in Epilepsy: A Scoping Review.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2023Article
- The implementation, use and impact of patient reported outcome measures in value-based healthcare programmes: A scoping review.PloS one · 2023Article
- NeuroMeasures-Implementation of a Web-Based, Real-Time Quality Metric Tool to Improve Provider Practices in an Epilepsy Clinic.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2022Article
- Seizure Prophylaxis After Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage.JAMA neurology · 2021Article
- Anticonvulsant Primary and Secondary Prophylaxis for Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients: A Decision Analysis.Stroke · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo see if systematic collection of patient-reported epilepsy quality measures can identify opportunities to improve care, and to examine the associations between these measures and physical and mental health.
methodsWe developed a patient-reported questionnaire for medication adherence, seizure frequency, medication side effects, and driving that included the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System-10 (PROMIS-10) (physical and mental health). We offered it to all adult patients seen twice in an epilepsy clinic (January 2017-January 2018). The questionnaire was available on the web as well as a tablet provided at appointment check-in. We used the first completed questionnaire to explore the relationship between patient-reported care quality and measures of physical and mental health.
resultsA total of 610 unique patients (15% of the total encounters) completed a survey. Respondents were comparable to nonrespondents. Respondents reported gaps in care or opportunities for quality improvement in 48.4% (n = 295) of the encounters. Of patients who reported at least 1 seizure per month over the previous 3 months, 55.2% (n = 100) reported problems with adherence, 30.0% (n = 131) reported having problems believed to be adverse reactions to anticonvulsants, and 15.2% (n = 41) reported driving. In addition, respondents who reported either seizures over the recent 3 months, nonadherence to treatment due to cost, or anticonvulsant-associated adverse effects had consistently worse physical and mental health (all
conclusionsSystematic collection of epilepsy quality measures endorsed by the American Academy of Neurology can identify opportunities for quality improvement. Measures of epilepsy care quality predict outcomes that matter to patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.