Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31666304›Full record

ArticleBMJ quality & safety2020

Factors associated with inappropriate use of emergency departments: findings from a cross-sectional national study in France.

Diane Naouri, Guillaume Ranchon, Albert Vuagnat, Jeannot Schmidt, Carlos El Khoury, Youri Yordanov, French Society of Emergency Medicine

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ quality & safety, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Factors associated with hospital revisitation within 7 days among patients discharged at triage: a case-control study.European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine · 2025
    Observational
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Diane NaouriSorbonne Université, AP-HP, Hôpital Saint Antoine, Service d'Accueil des Urgences, Paris, France naouri.diane@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2114-5826
Guillaume RanchonEmergency Department, Médipôle, Villeurbanne, France.
Albert VuagnatBiostatistics and Bioinformatics (DIM), University Hospital, Dijon, France.
Jeannot SchmidtEmergency Department, Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital, Clermont Ferrand, France.
Carlos El KhouryEmergency Department, Médipôle, Villeurbanne, France.
Youri YordanovSorbonne Université, AP-HP, Hôpital Saint Antoine, Service d'Accueil des Urgences, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0671-6547
French Society of Emergency Medicine

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInappropriate visits to emergency departments (EDs) could represent from 20% to 40% of all visits. Inappropriate use is a burden on healthcare costs and increases the risk of ED overcrowding. The aim of this study was to explore socioeconomic and geographical determinants of inappropriate ED use in France.

methodThe French Emergency Survey was a nationwide cross-sectional survey conducted on June 11 2013, simultaneously in all EDs in France and covered characteristics of patients, EDs and counties. The survey included 48 711 patient questionnaires and 734 ED questionnaires. We focused on adult patients (≥15 years old). The appropriateness of the ED visit was assessed by three measures: caring physician appreciation of appropriateness (numeric scale), caring physician appreciation of whether or not the patient could have been managed by a general practitioner and ED resource utilisation. Descriptive statistics and multilevel logistic regression were used to examine determinants of inappropriate ED use, estimating adjusted ORs and 95% CIs.

resultsAmong the 29 407 patients in our sample, depending on the measuring method, 13.5% to 27.4% ED visits were considered inappropriate. Regardless of the measure method used, likelihood of inappropriate use decreased with older age and distance from home to the ED >10 km. Not having a private supplementary health insurance, having universal supplementary health coverage and symptoms being several days old increased the likelihood of inappropriate use. Likelihood of inappropriate use was not associated with county medical density.

conclusionInappropriate ED use appeared associated with socioeconomic vulnerability (such as not having supplementary health coverage or having universal coverage) but not with geographical characteristics. It makes us question the appropriateness of the concept of inappropriate ED use as it does not consider the distress experienced by the patient, and segments of society seem to have few other choices to access healthcare than the ED.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleFranceGeographyHealth Services MisuseHumansMaleMiddle AgedSocioeconomic FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultemergency departmenthealthcare quality improvementhealth services researchprimary care

Identifiers

PMID31666304
PMCPMC7323738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.