Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31666281›Full record

ReviewClinical microbiology reviews2019

Tuberculosis Vaccine Development: Progress in Clinical Evaluation.

Suraj B Sable, James E Posey, Thomas J Scriba

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical microbiology reviews, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. HowVaccines · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Tuberculosis: An Update for the Clinician.Respirology (Carlton, Vic.) · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The frequency of CD38Nature communications · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Suraj B SableDivision of Tuberculosis Elimination, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA SSable@cdc.gov.ORCID 0000-0001-8440-1693
James E PoseyDivision of Tuberculosis Elimination, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Thomas J ScribaSouth African Tuberculosis Vaccine Initiative, Cape Town, South Africa.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USUniversity of Cape Town · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tuberculosis (TB) is the leading killer among all infectious diseases worldwide despite extensive use of the

Indexed as

ResearchAnimalsHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansImmunity, InnateMycobacterium bovisMycobacterium tuberculosisOutcome Assessment, Health CareTuberculosisTuberculosis VaccinesTuberculosis Vaccinesclinical trialsdesired attributesdevelopmental trajectorynatural immunitynew TB vaccinestuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID31666281
PMCPMC6822991
OpenAlexW2982373118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.