Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31666260›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Spatial epidemiology of gestational age and birth weight in Switzerland: census-based linkage study.

Veronika Skrivankova, Marcel Zwahlen, Mark Adams, Nicola Low, Claudia Kuehni, Matthias Egger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Road Traffic Noise Exposure and Birth Outcomes: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Spatiotemporal Patterns of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Rural Areas of Henan, China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Veronika SkrivankovaInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Marcel ZwahlenInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6772-6346
Mark AdamsDepartment of Neonatology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Nicola LowInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4817-8986
Claudia KuehniInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Matthias EggerInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland matthias.egger@ispm.unibe.ch.ORCID 0000-0001-7462-5132

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGestational age and birth weight are strong predictors of infant morbidity and mortality. Understanding spatial variation can inform policies to reduce health inequalities. We examined small-area variation in gestational age and birth weight in Switzerland.

methodsAll singleton live births recorded in the Swiss Live Birth Register 2011 to 2014 were eligible. We deterministically linked the Live Birth Register with census and survey data to create data sets including neonatal and pregnancy-related variables, parental characteristics and geographical variables. We produced maps of 705 areas and fitted linear mixed-effect models to assess to what extent spatial variation was explained by these variables.

resultsWe analysed all 315 177 eligible live births. Area-level averages of gestational age varied between 272 and 279 days, and between 3138 and 3467 g for birth weight. The fully adjusted models explained 31% and 87% of spatial variation of gestational age and birth weight, respectively. Language region accounted for most of the explained variation (23% in gestational age and 62% in birth weight), with shorter gestational age (-0.6 days and -0.9 days) and lower birth weight (-1.1% and -1.8%) in French-speaking and Italian-speaking areas, respectively, compared with German-speaking areas. Other variables explaining variation were, for gestational age, the level of urbanisation (10%) and parental nationality (3%). For birth weight, they were gestational age (27%), parental nationality (27%), civil status (10%) and altitude (10%). In a random sample of 81 968 live births with data on parental education, levels of education were only weakly associated with gestational age (-0.9 days for compulsory vs tertiary maternal education) or birth weight (-0.7% for compulsory vs tertiary maternal education).

conclusionsIn Switzerland, small area variation in birth weight is largely explained, and variation in gestational age partially explained, by geocultural, sociodemographic and pregnancy factors.

Indexed as

Birth WeightGestational AgeAdultCensusesFemaleHealth SurveysHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLive BirthMalePregnancyRegistriesSocioeconomic FactorsSpatial AnalysisSwitzerlandbirth weighteducationgestational agesocio-economic positionspatial epidemiologySwitzerland

Identifiers

PMID31666260
PMCPMC6830696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.