Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31666237›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of the rheumatic diseases2020

Open-label randomised pragmatic trial (CONTACT) comparing naproxen and low-dose colchicine for the treatment of gout flares in primary care.

Edward Roddy, Kris Clarkson, Milica Blagojevic-Bucknall, Rajnikant Mehta, Raymond Oppong, Anthony Avery, Elaine M Hay, Carl Heneghan, Liz Hartshorne, Julie Hooper and 10 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01994226 phase4completednot on this map

Multi-centre, Open-label, Active-comparator, Pragmatic Clinical Trial of Low-dose Colchicine Versus Naproxen in Patients With Acute Gout.

TypeinterventionalSponsorKeele UniversityRan2014 to 2016Enrolled399ConditionsGoutArmsLow-dose colchicine, Naproxen 750 mg/250 mg
NCT05698680 phase4terminatednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Pragmatic, Randomized, Multicenter, Double-blind, Controlled, Clinical Trial of Prednisolone Versus Colchicine for Acute Gout in Primary Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Medicine GreifswaldRan2023 to 2026Enrolled186ConditionsAcute GoutArmsPrednisolone 30 mg Tablet, Colchicine 0.5 mg Oral Tablet
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Korean guidelines for the management of gout.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2023
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for acute gout.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Colchicine for acute gout.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Gout and NLRP3 Inflammasome Biology.Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Korean guidelines for the management of gout.Journal of rheumatic diseases · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Current state and prospects of gout treatment in Korea.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Edward RoddyPrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis; School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, UK e.roddy@keele.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-8954-7082
Kris ClarksonPrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis; School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Milica Blagojevic-BucknallPrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis; School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7230-7771
Rajnikant MehtaBirmingham Acute Care Research/Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust/Institute of Applied Health Research (BCTU), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Raymond OppongHealth Economics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Anthony AveryDivision of Primary Care, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Elaine M HayPrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis; School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Carl HeneghanNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Liz HartshornePrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis; School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Julie HooperPrimary Care and Population Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Gemma HughesPrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis; School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Sue JowettPrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis; School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Martyn LewisPrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis; School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Paul LittlePrimary Care and Population Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Karen McCartneyDivision of Primary Care, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Kamal R MahtaniNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
David NunanNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Miriam SanterPrimary Care and Population Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Sam WilliamsPrimary Care and Population Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Christian D MallenPrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis; School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Arthritis UK · GBUniversity of Southampton · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GBHeart of England NHS Foundation Trust · GBMidlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GB

Funding

Department of Health RP_2014-04-026Department of Health RP-PG-0617-20005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare the effectiveness and safety of naproxen and low-dose colchicine for treating gout flares in primary care.

methodsThis was a multicentre open-label randomised trial. Adults with a gout flare recruited from 100 general practices were randomised equally to naproxen 750 mg immediately then 250 mg every 8 hours for 7 days or low-dose colchicine 500 mcg three times per day for 4 days. The primary outcome was change in worst pain intensity in the last 24 hours (0-10 Numeric Rating Scale) from baseline measured daily over the first 7 days: mean change from baseline was compared between groups over days 1-7 by intention to treat.

resultsBetween 29 January 2014 and 31 December 2015, we recruited 399 participants (naproxen n=200, colchicine n=199), of whom 349 (87.5%) completed primary outcome data at day 7. There was no significant between-group difference in average pain-change scores over days 1-7 (colchicine vs naproxen: mean difference -0.18; 95% CI -0.53 to 0.17; p=0.32). During days 1-7, diarrhoea (45.9% vs 20.0%; OR 3.31; 2.01 to 5.44) and headache (20.5% vs 10.7%; 1.92; 1.03 to 3.55) were more common in the colchicine group than the naproxen group but constipation was less common (4.8% vs 19.3%; 0.24; 0.11 to 0.54).

conclusionWe found no difference in pain intensity over 7 days between people with a gout flare randomised to either naproxen or low-dose colchicine. Naproxen caused fewer side effects supporting naproxen as first-line treatment for gout flares in primary care in the absence of contraindications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN (69836939), clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01994226), EudraCT (2013-001354-95).

Indexed as

ColchicineFemaleGoutGout SuppressantsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNaproxenPrimary Health CareSymptom Flare UpTreatment OutcomeColchicineGout SuppressantsNaproxencolchicinegoutnaproxenprimary carerandomised trial

Identifiers

PMID31666237
PMCPMC7025732
OpenAlexW2982516776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.