Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31666077›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2019

HIV prevalence in South Africa through gender and racial lenses: results from the 2012 population-based national household survey.

M Mabaso, L Makola, I Naidoo, L L Mlangeni, S Jooste, L Simbayi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
15.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Interventions currently implemented among orphans in South-Africa: a scoping review.SAHARA J : journal of Social Aspects of HIV/AIDS Research Alliance · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M MabasoSocial Aspects of Public Health Research Programme, Humans Sciences Research Council, Durban, South Africa. mmabaso@hsrc.ac.za.
L MakolaSocial Aspects of Public Health Research Programme, Humans Sciences Research Council, Durban, South Africa.
I NaidooSocial Aspects of Public Health Research Programme, Humans Sciences Research Council, Durban, South Africa.
L L MlangeniDepartment of Psychology, University of KwaZulu-Natal, 238 Mazisi Kunene Road, Glenwood, Durban, 4041, South Africa.
S JoosteSocial Aspects of Public Health Research Programme, Humans Sciences Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.
L SimbayiOffice of the Deputy Chief Executive Officer for Research, Human Sciences Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.
Human Sciences Research Council · ZAUniversity of KwaZulu-Natal · ZA

Funding

PEPFAR 5U2GGH000570
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn South Africa, persistence of the HIV epidemic and associated gender and racial disparities is a major concern after more than 20 years of democratic dispensation and efforts to create a more healthy and equal society. This paper profiles HIV prevalence and related factors among Black African men and women compared to other race groups in South Africa using the 2012 population-based national household HIV survey.

methodsThis secondary data analysis was based on the 2012 population-based nationally representative multi-stage stratified cluster random household sample. Bivariate and multiple logistic regression analysis were used to assess the relationship between HIV prevalence and associated factors by gender and racial profile.

resultsOverall HIV prevalence was significantly higher (p < 0.001) among both Black African males (16.6%; 95% CI: 15.0-18.4) and females (24.1%; 95% CI: 22.4-26.0) compared to their counterparts from other races. Among Black African males, increased risk of HIV was significantly associated with age group 25-49 years and those 50 years and older compared with young males 15-25 years. Among all males, reported condom use at last sex was significantly associated with increased risk of HIV. High socio-economic status (SES) and perceived risk of HIV were associated with a decreased risk of HIV. Among female condom use at last sex and ever testing for HIV was associated with increased prevalence of HIV only among Black African females. Lower prevalence of HIV was associated with marriage, tertiary education, high SES, having a partner five years younger, perceived risk of HIV, and awareness of HIV status among Black African females.

conclusionGender and racial disparities rooted in structural and contextual inequalities remain important factors for the maintenance of the generalized HIV epidemic in the country. HIV prevention interventions need to cut across all strata of society but also target risk factors salient for specific groups. Alleviating vulnerability to HIV along gender and racial lines should also be viewed as part of a broader public health strategy.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCluster AnalysisFemaleHealth SurveysHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceRacial GroupsRisk FactorsSex DistributionSouth AfricaSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultGender and racial disparitiesHIV prevalenceSouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID31666077
PMCPMC6821038
OpenAlexW2982397865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.