Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31666042›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2019

A rural community moves closer to sustainable obesity prevention - an exploration of community readiness pre and post a community-based participatory intervention.

Jillian Whelan, Penelope Love, Lynne Millar, Steven Allender, Catherine Morley, Colin Bell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jillian WhelanInstitute for Health Transformation, Global Obesity Centre, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia. jill.whelan@deakin.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9434-109X
Penelope LoveInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Lynne MillarAdjunct Fellow, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia.
Steven AllenderInstitute for Health Transformation, Global Obesity Centre, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Catherine MorleyWimmera Health Care Group, Horsham, Victoria, Australia.
Colin BellInstitute for Health Transformation, Global Obesity Centre, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.

Funding

Royal Flying Doctors Service, Victoria, Australia n/aRural Northwest Health, Victoria, Australia n/a
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderstanding levels of community readiness can result in prevention efforts that align with communities' ability and capacity for change and, therefore, be more effective and sustainable. Our study aimed to use baseline (pre-intervention) community readiness scores to assist with the development of obesity prevention strategies, and to assess changes in community readiness over time (pre/post- intervention), to provide evidence of intervention impact.

methodOur study was located in a rural and remote area of Victoria, Australia. Community readiness was part of a broader obesity prevention intervention designed to create healthier food and physical activity environments through the combination of systems thinking and collaborative community-led solutions. Interviews were conducted using the community readiness to change tool in 2016 (pre) and 2018 (post) with a community representative sample. Baseline data informed the development of community relevant strategies and the pre/post results formed part of the overall evaluation.

resultsThe tool generated both quantitative and qualitative (quotes) data. A final readiness score was calculated that corresponded to one of the nine stages of readiness. Four of the five domains of the community readiness to change tool showed statistically significant improvements over time (p < 0.05): knowledge of effort, knowledge of issue, community climate, and leadership. The resources domain that did not improve pre/post intervention.

conclusionCommunity readiness to change interviews, pre- and post- intervention, provided essential information related to the appropriate targeting and pitch of the prevention strategies, as well as providing an overall evaluation of the positive movement in the community's readiness to implement change.

Indexed as

AttitudeCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchPreventive Health ServicesRural PopulationAdultDietExerciseHumansLeadershipObesityVictoriaCommunity readinessObesity preventionRural health inequity

Identifiers

PMID31666042
PMCPMC6820900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.