Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31666038›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2019

End-of-life and palliative care of patients on maintenance hemodialysis treatment: a focus group study.

Lena Axelsson, Eva Benzein, Jenny Lindberg, Carina Persson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Breaking Through the Glass Ceiling-HavingThe Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Dialysis in the Elderly: A Practical Guide for the Clinician.International journal of nephrology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. When Patients Make Unexpected Medical Choices.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. The Suffering of Advanced Chronic Renal Patients and Their Relationship with Symptoms in Loja, Ecuador.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Observational
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lena AxelssonDepartment of Nursing Science, Sophiahemmet University, Box 5605, 114 86, Stockholm, Sweden. lena.axelsson@shh.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3647-1686
Eva BenzeinCentre for Collaborative Palliative Care, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden.
Jenny LindbergDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Unit of Medical Ethics, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Carina PerssonCentre for Collaborative Palliative Care, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden.

Funding

Familjen Kamprads Stiftelse 20152002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite complex illness trajectories and a high symptom burden, palliative care has been sub-optimal for patients with end-stage kidney disease and hemodialysis treatment who have a high rate of hospitalization and intensive care towards end of life. There is a growing awareness that further development of palliative care is required to meet the needs of these patients and their family members. In this process, it is important to explore healthcare professionals' views on provision of care. The aim of this study was therefore to describe nurses' and physicians' perspectives on end-of-life and palliative care of patients treated with maintenance hemodialysis.

methodsFour focus group interviews were conducted with renal nurses (17) and physicians (5) in Sweden. Qualitative content analysis was used to analyze data.

resultsParticipants were committed to giving the best possible care to their patients, but there were challenges and barriers to providing quality palliative care in nephrology settings. Professionals described palliative care as end-of-life care associated with hemodialysis withdrawal or palliative dialysis, but also identified care needs and possibilities that are in line with an earlier integrated palliative approach. This was perceived as complex from an organizational point of view. Participants identified challenges related to coordination of care and different perspectives on care responsibilities that impacted symptom management and patients' quality of life. Communication issues relating to the provision of palliative care were revealed where the hemodialysis setting was regarded as an impediment, and personal and professional experiences, beliefs and knowledge were considered of major importance.

conclusionsNurses and physicians identified a need for the improvement of both late and earlier palliative care approaches. The results highlighted a requirement for and possibilities of training, counselling and support of health care professionals in the dialysis context. Further, multi-professional palliative care collaborations should be developed to improve the coordination and organization of end-of-life and palliative care of patients and their family members. A climate allowing conversations about advance care planning throughout the illness trajectory may facilitate the gradual integration of palliative care alongside life-prolonging treatment for improved support of patients and families.

Indexed as

Disease ManagementAdultFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchQuality of Health CareRenal DialysisSwedenTerminal CareEnd-of-life careEnd-stage kidney diseaseFocus group interviewsHemodialysisNursesPalliative carePhysicians

Identifiers

PMID31666038
PMCPMC6822338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.