Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31665761›Full record

ArticleAnnals of botany2019

Sustainable bioenergy for climate mitigation: developing drought-tolerant trees and grasses.

G Taylor, I S Donnison, D Murphy-Bokern, M Morgante, M-B Bogeat-Triboulot, R Bhalerao, M Hertzberg, A Polle, A Harfouche, F Alasia and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of botany, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Enhancing the expression ofRoyal Society open science · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

G TaylorSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
I S DonnisonInstitute of Biological, Environmental & Rural Sciences (IBERS), Aberystwyth University, Plas Gogerddan, Aberystwyth, Ceredigion, UK.
D Murphy-BokernLindenweg 12, Kroge-Ehrendorf, Lohne, Germany.
M MorganteDepartment of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Udine, Via delle Scienze, Udine, Italy.
M-B Bogeat-TriboulotUniversité de Lorraine, INRA, AgroParisTech, UMR Silva, Nancy, France.
R BhaleraoDepartment of Forest Genetics and Plant Physiology, Umea Plant Sciences Centre, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umea, Sweden.
M HertzbergSweTree Technologies AB, SE-904 03 Umeå, Sweden.
A PolleBüsgen-Institute, Department of Forest Botany and Tree Physiology, Georg-August University, Göttingen, Germany.
A HarfoucheDepartment for Innovation in Biological, Agro-food and Forest Systems, University of Tuscia, Viterbo, Italy.
F AlasiaFranco Alasia Vivai, Strada Solerette, Savigliano, Italy.
V PetoussiDepartment of Sociology, University of Crete, Rethymno, Greece.
D TrebbiGeneticlab, Via Roveredo, Pordenone, Italy.
K SchwarzJulius Kühn-Institut (JKI) Bundesforschungsinstitut für Kulturpflanzen, Institute for Crop and Soil Science, Bundesallee 50, D-38116 Braunschweig, Germany.
J J B KeurentjesLaboratory of Genetics, Wageningen University & Research, Droevendaalsesteeg, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
M CentrittoTrees and Timber Institute, National Research Council of Italy, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy.
B GentyAix-Marseille University, CEA, CNRS, BIAM, UMR 7265, Saint Paul lez Durance, France.
J FlexasResearch Group on Plant Biology under Mediterranean Conditions, Departament de Biologia, Universitat de les Illes Balears, Carretera de Valldemossa, Palma de Mallorca, Illes Balears, Spain.
E GrillLehrstuhl für Botanik, Technische Universität München, Freising, Germany.
S SalviDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Bologna, Viale Fanin, Bologna, Italy.
W J DaviesLancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsBioenergy crops are central to climate mitigation strategies that utilize biogenic carbon, such as BECCS (bioenergy with carbon capture and storage), alongside the use of biomass for heat, power, liquid fuels and, in the future, biorefining to chemicals. Several promising lignocellulosic crops are emerging that have no food role - fast-growing trees and grasses - but are well suited as bioenergy feedstocks, including Populus, Salix, Arundo, Miscanthus, Panicum and Sorghum. SCOPE: These promising crops remain largely undomesticated and, until recently, have had limited germplasm resources. In order to avoid competition with food crops for land and nature conservation, it is likely that future bioenergy crops will be grown on marginal land that is not needed for food production and is of poor quality and subject to drought stress. Thus, here we define an ideotype for drought tolerance that will enable biomass production to be maintained in the face of moderate drought stress. This includes traits that can readily be measured in wide populations of several hundred unique genotypes for genome-wide association studies, alongside traits that are informative but can only easily be assessed in limited numbers or training populations that may be more suitable for genomic selection. Phenotyping, not genotyping, is now the major bottleneck for progress, since in all lignocellulosic crops studied extensive use has been made of next-generation sequencing such that several thousand markers are now available and populations are emerging that will enable rapid progress for drought-tolerance breeding. The emergence of novel technologies for targeted genotyping by sequencing are particularly welcome. Genome editing has already been demonstrated for Populus and offers significant potential for rapid deployment of drought-tolerant crops through manipulation of ABA receptors, as demonstrated in Arabidopsis, with other gene targets yet to be tested.

conclusionsBioenergy is predicted to be the fastest-developing renewable energy over the coming decade and significant investment over the past decade has been made in developing genomic resources and in collecting wild germplasm from within the natural ranges of several tree and grass crops. Harnessing these resources for climate-resilient crops for the future remains a challenge but one that is likely to be successful.

Indexed as

DroughtsTreesClimateCrops, AgriculturalGenome-Wide Association StudyArundolignocellulosic cropmarginal landMiscanthusmolecular breedingnext-generation sequencingPopulus

Identifiers

PMID31665761
PMCPMC6821384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.