Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31665612›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of respiratory and critical care medicine2020

Static and Dynamic Contributors to Ventilator-induced Lung Injury in Clinical Practice. Pressure, Energy, and Power.

John J Marini, Patricia R M Rocco, Luciano Gattinoni

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06531005 (Assessment of Ventilation Parameters for Extubation Prediction in ICU), which is not on this map. Cited by 131 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
131citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06531005 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Assessment of Ventilation Parameters for Extubation Prediction in ICU

TypeobservationalSponsorAnkara UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled100ConditionsAcute Respiratory Failure, Invasive Mechanical Ventilation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

131 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The role of mechanical power in lung ventilation for the prevention of ventilator-induced lung injury: a narrative review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

71 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

John J MariniUniversity of Minnesota and Regions Hospital, Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-9851-2076
Patricia R M RoccoLaboratory of Pulmonary Investigation, Carlos Chagas Filho Biophysics Institute, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; and.
Luciano GattinoniDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5380-2494

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ventilation is inherently a dynamic process. The present-day clinical practice of concentrating on the static inflation characteristics of the individual tidal cycle (plateau pressure, positive end-expiratory pressure, and their difference [driving pressure, the ratio of Vt to compliance]) does not take into account key factors shown experimentally to influence ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). These include rate of airway pressure change (influenced by flow amplitude, inspiratory time fraction, and inspiratory inflation contour) and cycling frequency. Energy must be expended to cause injury, and the product of applied stress and resulting strain determines the energy delivered to the lungs per breathing cycle. Understanding the principles of VILI energetics may provide valuable insights and guidance to intensivists for safer clinical practice. In this interpretive review, we highlight that the injuring potential of the inflation pattern depends upon tissue vulnerability, the number of intolerable high-energy cycles applied in unit time (mechanical power), and the duration of that exposure. Yet, as attractive as this energy/power hypothesis for encapsulating the drivers of VILI may be for clinical applications, we acknowledge that even these all-inclusive and measurable ergonomic parameters (energy per cycle and power) are still too bluntly defined to pinpoint the precise biophysical link between ventilation strategy and tissue injury.

Indexed as

Biophysical PhenomenaHumansPressureVentilator-Induced Lung Injuryacute respiratory distress syndromeenergylung protective ventilationpowerventilator-induced lung injury

Identifiers

PMID31665612
PMCPMC7124710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.