Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31665486›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental botany2020

Linking fundamental science to crop improvement through understanding source and sink traits and their integration for yield enhancement.

Matthew J Paul, Amy Watson, Cara A Griffiths

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental botany, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Metabolic Responses ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Impacts of elevated COFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Sucrose Utilization for Improved Crop Yields: A Review Article.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Trehalose 6-phosphate signalling and impact on crop yield.Biochemical Society transactions · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Matthew J PaulPlant Science, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, UK.
Amy WatsonPlant Science, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, UK.
Cara A GriffithsPlant Science, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N004205/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding processes in sources and sinks that contribute to crop yields has taken years of painstaking research. For crop yield improvement, processes need to be understood as standalone mechanisms in addition to how these mechanisms perform at the crop level; currently there is often a chasm between the two. Fundamental mechanisms need to be considered in the context of crop ideotypes and the agricultural environment which is often more water limited than carbon limited. Different approaches for improvement should be considered, namely is there genetic variation? Or if not, could genetic modification, genome editing, or alternative approaches be utilized? Currently, there are few examples where genetic modification has improved intrinsic yield in the field for commercial application in a major crop. Genome editing, particularly of negative yield regulators as a first step, is providing new opportunities. Here we highlight key mechanisms in source and sink, arguing that for large yield increases integration of key processes is likely to produce the biggest successes within the framework of crop ideotypes with optimized phenology. We highlight a plethora of recent papers that show breakthroughs in fundamental science and the promise of the trehalose 6-phosphate signalling pathway, which regulates carbohydrate allocation which is key for many crop traits.

Indexed as

AgricultureCarbonPhenotypeCarbonCarbohydrate allocationcrop yieldssource–sinktraitstrehalose 6-phosphatewheat

Identifiers

PMID31665486
PMCPMC7134924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.