Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31665314›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism2020

Bone Mineral Density After Transitioning From Denosumab to Alendronate.

David Kendler, Arkadi Chines, Patricia Clark, Peter R Ebeling, Michael McClung, Yumie Rhee, Shuang Huang, Robert Kees Stad

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 60 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00518531 phase3completednot on this map

A Multicenter, Randomized, Cross-Over, Open-label Study to Evaluate the Adherence, Preference, and Satisfaction of Denosumab and Alendronate in Postmenopausal Women With Low Bone Mineral Density

TypeinterventionalSponsorAmgenRan2007 to 2010Enrolled250ConditionsOsteoporosisArmsalendronate, denosumab
NCT07406685 phase4recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

The Comparison of Ibandronate and Zoledronic Acid After Denosumab Discontinuation: A Randomized Non-inferiority Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Taiwan University HospitalRan2026 to 2030Enrolled52ConditionsPostmenopausal Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal Osteopenia, Primary Osteoporosis, OsteoporosisArmsIbandronate IV, Zoledronic acid IV
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Guideline
  7. Osteoporosis Management in the Era of COVID-19.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2020
    Guideline
  8. One versus 2 years of alendronate following denosumab: the CARD extension.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2024
    Trial
  9. The Effect of Zoledronic Acid on Bone Microarchitecture and Strength after Denosumab and Teriparatide Administration: DATA-HD Study Extension.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2023
    Trial
  10. Multiple Vertebral Fractures After Denosumab Discontinuation: FREEDOM and FREEDOM Extension Trials Additional Post Hoc Analyses.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2022
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Denosumab-efficacy, safety, persistence and sequential strategies-a systematic review.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Review
  13. [Interpretation of 2024 United Kingdom National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG) Clinical Guidelines: Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Non-metastatic breast cancer patients discontinuing aromatase inhibitor on denosumab: what next?Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

David KendlerUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Arkadi ChinesAmgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, US.
Patricia ClarkHospital Infantil de Mexico Federico Gómez and National University of Mexico-UNAM, Mexico City, Mexico.
Peter R EbelingMonash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Michael McClungOregon Osteoporosis Center, Portland, OR, US.
Yumie RheeYonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Shuang HuangAmgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, US.
Robert Kees StadAmgen Inc., Rotkreuz, Switzerland.
Amgen (United States) · USAmgen (Switzerland) · CHBone Health and Osteoporosis Foundation · USHospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez · MXMonash University · AUUniversity of British Columbia · CAYonsei University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextThere are few studies on patients transitioning from denosumab to bisphosphonates.

objectiveTo investigate patient characteristics and changes in bone mineral density (BMD) after transitioning from denosumab to alendronate.

designRandomized, open-label, 2-year crossover Denosumab Adherence Preference Satisfaction (DAPS) study (NCT00518531).

setting25 study centers in the US and Canada. PATIENTS: Treatment-naïve postmenopausal women with BMD T-scores from -2.0 to -4.0.

interventionsThis post hoc analysis evaluated women randomized to subcutaneous denosumab 60 mg every 6 months in year 1 followed by once-weekly oral alendronate 70 mg in year 2.

main outcome measureA 3% BMD threshold identified participants who lost, maintained, or gained BMD in year 2 on alendronate.

resultsOf 126 participants randomized to denosumab, 115 (91%) transitioned to alendronate in year 2. BMD increased by 3% to 6% with denosumab in year 1 and by 0% to 1% with alendronate in year 2. After transitioning to alendronate, most participants maintained or increased BMD; 15.9%, 7.6%, and 21.7% lost BMD at the lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck, respectively. Few participants fell below their pretreatment baseline BMD value; this occurred most often in those who lost BMD in year 2. Women who lost BMD with alendronate in year 2 also showed a greater percent change in BMD with denosumab in year 1. The BMD change in year 2 was similar regardless of baseline characteristics or adherence to oral alendronate.

conclusionAlendronate can effectively maintain the BMD gains accrued after 1 year of denosumab in most patients, regardless of baseline characteristics.

Indexed as

AgedAlendronateBone DensityBone Density Conservation AgentsCross-Over StudiesDenosumabFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalPrognosisAlendronateBone Density Conservation AgentsDenosumabalendronatebisphosphonatesbone mineral densitydenosumabosteoporosis

Identifiers

PMID31665314
PMCPMC7112973
OpenAlexW2982598109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.