ArticlePloS one2019
Stated-preference research in HIV: A scoping review.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Use of Stated Preference Methods in HIV Treatment and Prevention Research in the United States: A Systematic Review.AIDS and behavior · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- A community-based dynamic choice model for HIV prevention improves PrEP and PEP coverage in rural Uganda and Kenya: a cluster randomized trial.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2023Trial
- Identifying Key Intervention Attributes Driving Acceptability of Spouse/Partner-Centered HIV Interventions in Vietnam Using Conjoint Analysis.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Article
- More evidence is needed to improve molecular HIV surveillance for cluster detection and response.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- Patient preferences and willingness to pay for transitional care in breast cancer: a discrete choice experiment.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Article
- Preferences for Hypertension Care in Malawi: A Discrete Choice Experiment Among People Living with Hypertension, With and Without HIV.AIDS and behavior · 2025Article
- Article
- Understanding the Acceptability of Broadly Neutralizing Antibodies for HIV Prevention Among At-Risk Populations and Feasibility Considerations for Product Introduction in India: Protocol for a Qualitative Study.JMIR research protocols · 2024Article
- Stated preferences for new HIV prevention technologies among men who have sex with men in India: A discrete choice experiment.PloS one · 2024Article
- Client preferences for HIV Care Coordination Program features in New York City: latent class analysis of a discrete choice experiment.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2023Article
- Preferences for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among sexual and gender minorities: a discrete choice experiment in Brazil.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2023Article
- Addressing key issues in HIV self-test program implementation for Black and Latino sexual minority men in the Southern United States: a multiphase study protocol.Implementation science communications · 2023Article
- Placing the values and preferences of people most affected by TB at the center of screening and testing: an approach for reaching the unreached.BMC global and public health · 2023Article
- Provider preferences for delivery of HIV care coordination services: results from a discrete choice experiment.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2022Article
- The role of material deprivations in determining ART adherence: Evidence from a conjoint analysis among HIV-positive adults in Uganda.PLOS global public health · 2022Article
- Article
- Patients' preferences for antiretroviral therapy service provision: a systematic review.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2021Review
- A qualitative study of the barriers and enhancers to retention in care for pregnant and postpartum women living with HIV.PLOS global public health · 2021Article
- Using individual stated-preferences to optimize HIV self-testing service delivery among men who have sex with men (MSM) in Malaysia: results from a conjoint-based analysis.BMC public health · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Discrete choice experiments (DCE), conjoint analysis (CA), and best-worst scaling (BWS) are quantitative techniques for estimating consumer preferences for products or services. These methods are increasingly used in healthcare research, but their applications within the field of HIV research have not yet been described. The objective of this scoping review was to systematically map the extent and nature of published DCE, CA, and BWS studies in the field of HIV and identify priority areas where these methods can be used in the future. Online databases were searched to identify published HIV-related DCE, CA and BWS studies in any country and year as the primary outcome. After screening 1,496 citations, 57 studies were identified that were conducted in 26 countries from 2000-2017. The frequency of published studies increased over time and covered HIV themes relating to prevention (n = 25), counselling and testing (n = 10), service delivery (n = 10), and antiretroviral therapy (n = 12). Most studies were DCEs (63%) followed by CA (37%) and BWS (4%). The median [IQR] sample size was 288 [138-496] participants, and 74% of studies used primary qualitative data to develop attributes. Only 30% of studies were conducted in sub-Saharan Africa where the burden of HIV is highest. Moreover, few studies surveyed key populations including men who have sex with men, transgender people, pregnant and postpartum women, adolescents, and people who inject drugs. These populations represent priorities for future stated-preference research. This scoping review can help researchers, policy makers, program implementers, and health economists to better understand the various applications of stated-preference research methods in the field of HIV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.