Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31665138›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Multi-breed genome-wide association studies across countries for electronically recorded behavior traits in local dual-purpose cows.

Tong Yin, Maria Jaeger, Carsten Scheper, Gregorz Grodkowski, Tomasz Sakowski, Marija Klopčič, Beat Bapst, Sven König

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tong YinInstitute of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Justus-Liebig-University of Gießen, Gießen, Germany.
Maria JaegerInstitute of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Justus-Liebig-University of Gießen, Gießen, Germany.
Carsten ScheperInstitute of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Justus-Liebig-University of Gießen, Gießen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1189-2297
Gregorz GrodkowskiInstitute of Genetics and Animal Breeding of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Jastrzębiec, Poland.
Tomasz SakowskiInstitute of Genetics and Animal Breeding of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Jastrzębiec, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2264-4638
Marija KlopčičUniversity of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty, Department of Animal Science, Domzale, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0003-0790-980X
Beat BapstGenetic evaluation center, Qualitas AG, Switzerland.
Sven KönigInstitute of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Justus-Liebig-University of Gießen, Gießen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Basic bovine behavior is a crucial parameter influencing cattle domestication. In addition, behavior has an impact on cattle productivity, welfare and adaptation. The aim of the present study was to infer quantitative genetic and genomic mechanisms contributing to natural dual-purpose cow behavior in grazing systems. In this regard, we genotyped five dual-purpose breeds for a dense SNP marker panel from four different European countries. All cows from the across-country study were equipped with the same electronic recording devices. In this regard, we analyzed 97,049 longitudinal sensor behavior observations from 319 local dual-purpose cows for rumination, feeding, basic activity, high active, not active and ear temperature. According to the specific sensor behaviors and following a welfare protocol, we computed two different welfare indices. For genomic breed characterizations and multi-breed genome-wide association studies, sensor traits and test-day production records were merged with 35,826 SNP markers per cow. For the estimation of variance components, we used the pedigree relationship matrix and a combined similarity matrix that simultaneously included both pedigree and genotypes. Heritabilities for feeding, high active and not active were in a moderate range from 0.16 to 0.20. Estimates were very similar from both relationship matrix-modeling approaches and had quite small standard errors. Heritabilities for the remaining sensor traits (feeding, basic activity, ear temperature) and welfare indices were lower than 0.09. Five significant SNPs on chromosomes 11, 17, 27 and 29 were associated with rumination, and two different SNPs significantly influenced the sensor traits "not active" (chromosome 13) and "feeding" (chromosome 23). Gene annotation analyses inferred 22 potential candidate genes with a false discovery rate lower than 20%, mostly associated with rumination (13 genes) and feeding (8 genes). Mendelian randomization based on genomic variants (i.e., the instrumental variables) was used to infer causal inference between an exposure and an outcome. Significant regression coefficients among behavior traits indicate that all specific behavioral mechanisms contribute to similar physiological processes. The regression coefficients of rumination and feeding on milk yield were 0.10 kg/% and 0.12 kg/%, respectively, indicating their positive influence on dual-purpose cow productivity. Genomically, an improved welfare behavior of grazing cattle, i.e., a higher score for welfare indices, was significantly associated with increased fat and protein percentages.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyAnimalsBreedingCattleChromosomesFemaleGenomeGenotypeLactationMilkPhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideQuantitative Trait Loci

Identifiers

PMID31665138
PMCPMC6821105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.