Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31665089›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR2019

Impact of Docetaxel on blood-brain barrier function and formation of breast cancer brain metastases.

Simon Bernatz, Elena I Ilina, Kavi Devraj, Patrick N Harter, Klaus Mueller, Sascha Kleber, Yannick Braun, Cornelia Penski, Christoph Renner, Rashi Halder and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Experimental models for cancer brain metastasis.Cancer pathogenesis and therapy · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. The Journey of Cancer Cells to the Brain: Challenges and Opportunities.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

Simon BernatzEdinger Institute, Institute of Neurology, University of Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany.
Elena I IlinaEdinger Institute, Institute of Neurology, University of Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany.
Kavi DevrajEdinger Institute, Institute of Neurology, University of Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany.
Patrick N HarterEdinger Institute, Institute of Neurology, University of Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany.
Klaus MuellerEdinger Institute, Institute of Neurology, University of Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany.
Sascha KleberOncology Centre Hirslanden and Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Yannick BraunEdinger Institute, Institute of Neurology, University of Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany.
Cornelia PenskiEdinger Institute, Institute of Neurology, University of Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany.
Christoph RennerOncology Centre Hirslanden and Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Rashi HalderLuxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine (LCSB), University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.
Lukas JenneweinDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, School of Medicine, J. W. Goethe-University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, D-60590, Frankfurt, Germany.
Christine SolbachDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, School of Medicine, J. W. Goethe-University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, D-60590, Frankfurt, Germany.
Frits ThorsenKG Jebsen Brain Tumor Research Centre, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Bernhard C PestalozziDepartment of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Zurich (USZ), Rämistrasse 100, CH-8891, Zurich, Switzerland.
Axel MischoDepartment of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Zurich (USZ), Rämistrasse 100, CH-8891, Zurich, Switzerland. axel.mischo@usz.ch.
Michel MittelbronnEdinger Institute, Institute of Neurology, University of Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany. Michel.MITTELBRONN@lns.etat.lu.
University Hospital Frankfurt · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DEKlinik Hirslanden · CHUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CHFrankfurt Cancer Institute · DELaboratoire National de Santé · LULuxembourg Institute of Health · LUUniversity of Bergen · NOUniversity of Luxembourg · LU

Funding

Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg PEARL P16/BM/11192868
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast cancer (BC) is the most frequent malignant tumor in females and the 2nd most common cause of brain metastasis (BM), that are associated with a fatal prognosis. The increasing incidence from 10% up to 40% is due to more effective treatments of extracerebral sites with improved prognosis and increasing use of MRI in diagnostics. A frequently administered, potent chemotherapeutic group of drugs for BC treatment are taxanes usually used in the adjuvant and metastatic setting, which, however, have been suspected to be associated with a higher incidence of BM. The aim of our study was to experimentally analyze the impact of the taxane docetaxel (DTX) on brain metastasis formation, and to elucidate the underlying molecular mechanism.

methodsA monocentric patient cohort was analyzed to determine the association of taxane treatment and BM formation. To identify the specific impact of DTX, a murine brain metastatic model upon intracardial injection of breast cancer cells was conducted. To approach the functional mechanism, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and electron microscopy of mice as well as in-vitro transendothelial electrical resistance (TEER) and tracer permeability assays using brain endothelial cells (EC) were carried out. PCR-based, immunohistochemical and immunoblotting analyses with additional RNA sequencing of murine and human ECs were performed to explore the molecular mechanisms by DTX treatment.

resultsTaxane treatment was associated with an increased rate of BM formation in the patient cohort and the murine metastatic model. Functional studies did not show unequivocal alterations of blood-brain barrier properties upon DTX treatment in-vivo, but in-vitro assays revealed a temporary DTX-related barrier disruption. We found disturbance of tubulin structure and upregulation of tight junction marker claudin-5 in ECs. Furthermore, upregulation of several members of the tubulin family and downregulation of tetraspanin-2 in both, murine and human ECs, was induced.

conclusionIn summary, a higher incidence of BM was associated with prior taxane treatment in both a patient cohort and a murine mouse model. We could identify tubulin family members and tetraspanin-2 as potential contributors for the destabilization of the blood-brain barrier. Further analyses are needed to decipher the exact role of those alterations on tumor metastatic processes in the brain.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBlood-Brain BarrierBrain NeoplasmsBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorClaudin-5DocetaxelFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiceMicroscopy, ElectronSequence Analysis, RNAAntineoplastic AgentsClaudin-5CLDN5 protein, humanDocetaxelTubulinBBBBrain metastasisBreast cancerDocetaxelTaxaneTEER

Identifiers

PMID31665089
PMCPMC6819416
OpenAlexW2982425927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.