Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31665063›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2019

Endogenous retroviral insertions drive non-canonical imprinting in extra-embryonic tissues.

Courtney W Hanna, Raquel Pérez-Palacios, Lenka Gahurova, Michael Schubert, Felix Krueger, Laura Biggins, Simon Andrews, Maria Colomé-Tatché, Deborah Bourc'his, Wendy Dean and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 6 countries.

Courtney W HannaEpigenetics Programme, Babraham Institute, Cambridge, UK. courtney.hanna@babraham.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-4063-5575
Raquel Pérez-PalaciosInstitut Curie, PSL University, Inserm, CNRS, Paris, France.
Lenka GahurovaUniversity of South Bohemia, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic.
Michael SchubertEuropean Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Felix KruegerBioinformatics, Babraham Institute, Cambridge, UK.
Laura BigginsBioinformatics, Babraham Institute, Cambridge, UK.
Simon AndrewsBioinformatics, Babraham Institute, Cambridge, UK.
Maria Colomé-TatchéEuropean Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Deborah Bourc'hisInstitut Curie, PSL University, Inserm, CNRS, Paris, France.
Wendy DeanEpigenetics Programme, Babraham Institute, Cambridge, UK.
Gavin KelseyEpigenetics Programme, Babraham Institute, Cambridge, UK. gavin.kelsey@babraham.ac.uk.
Babraham Institute · GBCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of South Bohemia in České Budějovice · CZ

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/B/000C0423Medical Research Council MR/K011332/1Medical Research Council MR/S000437/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenomic imprinting is an epigenetic phenomenon that allows a subset of genes to be expressed mono-allelically based on the parent of origin and is typically regulated by differential DNA methylation inherited from gametes. Imprinting is pervasive in murine extra-embryonic lineages, and uniquely, the imprinting of several genes has been found to be conferred non-canonically through maternally inherited repressive histone modification H3K27me3. However, the underlying regulatory mechanisms of non-canonical imprinting in post-implantation development remain unexplored.

resultsWe identify imprinted regions in post-implantation epiblast and extra-embryonic ectoderm (ExE) by assaying allelic histone modifications (H3K4me3, H3K36me3, H3K27me3), gene expression, and DNA methylation in reciprocal C57BL/6 and CAST hybrid embryos. We distinguish loci with DNA methylation-dependent (canonical) and independent (non-canonical) imprinting by assaying hybrid embryos with ablated maternally inherited DNA methylation. We find that non-canonical imprints are localized to endogenous retrovirus-K (ERVK) long terminal repeats (LTRs), which act as imprinted promoters specifically in extra-embryonic lineages. Transcribed ERVK LTRs are CpG-rich and located in close proximity to gene promoters, and imprinting status is determined by their epigenetic patterning in the oocyte. Finally, we show that oocyte-derived H3K27me3 associated with non-canonical imprints is not maintained beyond pre-implantation development at these elements and is replaced by secondary imprinted DNA methylation on the maternal allele in post-implantation ExE, while being completely silenced by bi-allelic DNA methylation in the epiblast.

conclusionsThis study reveals distinct epigenetic mechanisms regulating non-canonical imprinted gene expression between embryonic and extra-embryonic development and identifies an integral role for ERVK LTR repetitive elements.

Indexed as

Genomic ImprintingHistone CodeMaternal InheritanceAnimalsDNA MethylationFemaleMaleMiceRetroviridaeTerminal Repeat SequencesDevelopmentEmbryoEndogenous retroviruses (ERVs)Extra-embryonicGenomic imprintingH3K27me3Histone modificationsLong terminal repeats (LTRs)Non-canonical imprintingPlacenta

Identifiers

PMID31665063
PMCPMC6819472
OpenAlexW2982377894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.