Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31665021›Full record

ArticleNutrition journal2019

Validation and reproducibility of a new iodine specific food frequency questionnaire for assessing iodine intake in Norwegian pregnant women.

Synnøve Næss, Inger Aakre, Marian Kjellevold, Lisbeth Dahl, Ive Nerhus, Lisa Kolden Midtbø, Maria Wik Markhus

Registry-linked trialAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrition journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02610959 (Iodine Status During Pregnancy and Its Effect on Infant Development; a Randomized Intervention Study With Cod), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02610959 nacompletednot on this map

Iodine Status During Pregnancy and Its Effect on Infant Development; a Randomized Intervention Study With Cod

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Institute of Nutrition and Seafood Research, NorwayRan2015 to 2018Enrolled137ConditionsDiet, NeurodevelopmentArmsIntervention group, Control group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Synnøve NæssInstitute of Marine Research (IMR), 5817, Bergen, Norway. synnoeve.naess@hi.no.ORCID 0000-0002-0677-618X
Inger AakreInstitute of Marine Research (IMR), 5817, Bergen, Norway.
Marian KjellevoldInstitute of Marine Research (IMR), 5817, Bergen, Norway.
Lisbeth DahlInstitute of Marine Research (IMR), 5817, Bergen, Norway.
Ive NerhusInstitute of Marine Research (IMR), 5817, Bergen, Norway.
Lisa Kolden MidtbøInstitute of Marine Research (IMR), 5817, Bergen, Norway.
Maria Wik MarkhusInstitute of Marine Research (IMR), 5817, Bergen, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIodized salt is not mandatory in Norway, and the permitted level of iodine in table salt is low (5 μg/g). Thus, milk and dairy products, fish and eggs are the main dietary sources of iodine in Norway. Mild-to-moderate iodine deficiency in pregnant women has been described in several European countries, including Norway. There are few validated tools available to assess iodine intake in an efficient manner. The aim of the current study was to assess the validity and reproducibility of a new iodine-specific food frequency questionnaire (I-FFQ) in Norwegian pregnant women.

methodsAn I-FFQ consisting of a total of 60 food items and the use of supplements was developed to assess iodine intake and was administrated to 137 pregnant women at gestational week 18-19. Reference methods were a structured 6-days iodine specific food diary, urinary iodine concentration (UIC) (pooled sample of spot UIC from six consecutive days), and thyroid function tests. Correlation analyses, Cohen's weighted kappa, Bland-Altman plots, and linear regression analyses were used to assess validity. Reproducibility of the I-FFQ was assessed in a subgroup (n = 47) at gestational week 35-36.

resultsThere was a strong correlation between estimated iodine intake from the I-FFQ and food diary (r = 0.62, P < 0.001) and an acceptable correlation between the I-FFQ and UIC (r = 0.21, P = 0.018). There was no significant association between the I-FFQ and thyroid function tests. The I-FFQ estimated higher iodine intake compared to the food diary with a mean absolute difference 33 μg/day. The limits of agreement from the Bland-Altman plots were large, however few participants fell outside the limits of agreement (5.2-6.5%). There was no difference between the estimated iodine intake from the I-FFQ assessed at gestational week 18-19, and gestational week 35-36 (P = 0.866), and there was a strong correlation between the two time points (r = 0.63, P < 0.001).

conclusionIn summary, this study suggests that the I-FFQ can be used as a valid tool to estimate and rank iodine intake among Norwegian pregnant women. We further suggest that this I-FFQ may also be valid in other populations with similarly dietary patterns and where salt is not iodized.

trial registrationThe study is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02610959).

Indexed as

Diet RecordsNutrition AssessmentAdultDietFemaleHumansIodineNorwayPregnancyReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesIodineDietary assessmentFFQIodinePregnancyValidation

Identifiers

PMID31665021
PMCPMC6821006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.