Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31665009›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2019

Improving students' learning environment by DREEM: an educational experiment in an Iranian medical sciences university (2011-2016).

Hamid Bakhshialiabad, Golnaz Bakhshi, Zahra Hashemi, Amirhosein Bakhshi, Faroukh Abazari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A four-Axis-Method to Evaluate a Part of an Undergraduate Medical Students' Curriculum.Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hamid BakhshialiabadDepartment of Medical Education, Molecular medicine Research Center (mmrc) Faculty of medicine, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran. hamid2341@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2257-8378
Golnaz BakhshiIslamic Azad University, School of Medical Sciences, Baft, Iran.
Zahra HashemiDepartment of Medical sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran.
Amirhosein BakhshiIslamic Azad University, Yazd, Iran.
Faroukh AbazariDepartment of health nursing, Kerman University of medical sciences, school of Nursing and Midwifery, Kerman, Iran.

Funding

research deputy of RUMS 1394/25
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudents' perception of the educational setting is an important source for improving and applying changes to the educational environment. In this study, we reassessed undergraduate students' perception of the educational environment at two colleges of RUMS-Iran in the academic years of 2011 and 2016.

methodsIn the present prospective study, the DREEM inventory consisted of seven courses for undergraduate paramedical and nursing-midwifery students (n = 982). After the first stage, educational seminars and workshops were set up for academic members and faculty staff on deficiencies and the ideal climate for optimizing the educational environment. The results of students' responses in 2011 were compared with those assessed in 2016. For the data analysis, the independent t-test and the one-way ANOVA were utilized.

resultsIn the academic year of 2010-2011, the DREEM inventory scored 115.33/200 (57.66%); it also scored 123.47/200 (60.7%) in the academic year of 2015-2016 (p ≤ 0.01). There was an interesting feeling about the first-year education, and female students felt a more positively perceived learning environment during all courses than male students at both stages of the study. There were significant positive differences (2 to 7%) in all domains of the components of DREEM in all courses between the academic year of 2010-2011 and the academic year of 2015-2016, showing that the DREEM score had changed and increased (p < 0.05), in the latter case.

conclusionsPositive differences were observed in DREEM scores between the two stages of the study. DREEM helped reduce the areas of deficiencies in students' perception of many aspects of the educational environment. It also helped identify problematic areas in the improvement. In addition, DREEM could be used to optimize and make modifications to the educational environment.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCurriculumData CollectionEducation, Medical, UndergraduateFemaleHumansIranMaleProspective StudiesStudents, MedicalStudents, NursingYoung AdultEducational programsLearning environmentRafsanjan University of Medical Science (RUMS)Students

Identifiers

PMID31665009
PMCPMC6821025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.