Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31664987›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2019

Online reported women's experiences of symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse after vaginal birth.

Maria Mirskaya, Eva-Carin Lindgren, Ing-Marie Carlsson

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07218016 (Accelerometer Measured Early Recovery After Prolapse Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07218016 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Accelerometer Measured Early Recovery After Prolapse Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorNICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders NetworkRan2025 to 2028Enrolled288ConditionsPelvic Organ Prolapse, Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP), Pelvic Organ Prolapse Vaginal Surgery, Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Patient EducationArmsPostoperative Exercise regimen
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maria MirskayaDepartment of Health and Welfare, Halmstad University, SE-823, SE-301 18, Halmstad, Sweden. maria.mirskaya@hh.se.ORCID 0000-0002-5224-6411
Eva-Carin LindgrenDepartment of Health and Welfare, Halmstad University, SE-823, SE-301 18, Halmstad, Sweden.
Ing-Marie CarlssonDepartment of Health and Welfare, Halmstad University, SE-823, SE-301 18, Halmstad, Sweden.
Halmstad University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a major public health problem with a relative high lifetime risk of surgery. The main risk factor for developing POP is vaginal birth. Many women become symptomatic later in life and most of the existing research on symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse (sPOP) predominantly concentrates on the effects of the condition on postmenopausal women. However bothersome symptoms of POP can be reported as early as in women's 20s and may occur shortly after vaginal birth. Limited studies provide an insight into daily life of fertile women with sPOP. Thus, we aimed to explore fertile women's experiences of symptomatic pelvic organ (sPOP) after vaginal birth.

methodsAn inductive, text-driven approach was taken by selecting thread posts from an internet forum written by 33 Swedish fertile women who had experienced sPOP after vaginal birth.

resultsThe overarching theme "being irreparably damaged" was identified as representing an experience of being disabled by sPOP after vaginal birth. The fertile women experienced that their lives were ruined because of physical and psychological limitations caused by this unexpected, unfamiliar and unexplained condition. Living with sPOP impinged on sexual health, restricted daily and sports activities and affected the women's ability to fulfill everyday parental duties. This in turn compromised women's psychological health. In addition, the negligence of healthcare professionals who tended to trivialize and normalize the symptoms led to the belief that there were no sustainable treatments and that women would have to live with bothersome symptoms of POP for rest of their lives.

conclusionsThis study found that sPOP had a significant negative impact on fertile women's lives. The women indicated that they had not had the opportunity to voice their concerns and had not been taken seriously by healthcare professionals. It is of the utmost importance to acknowledge this problem and develop guidelines for prevention and management of sPOP to improve the quality of life for women.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthCost of IllnessActivities of Daily LivingAdultDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPelvic Organ ProlapseQuality of LifeRisk FactorsSwedenVaginaFertile womenPelvic organ prolapsePelvic organ prolapse symptomsPsychological traumaQualitative researchVaginal birth

Identifiers

PMID31664987
PMCPMC6819438
OpenAlexW2982561456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.