Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31664981›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2019

Impact of the village health center project on contraceptive behaviors in rural Jordan: a quasi-experimental difference-in-differences analysis.

Makiko Komasawa, Motoyuki Yuasa, Yoshihisa Shirayama, Miho Sato, Yutaka Komasawa, Malak Alouri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Makiko KomasawaDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, 2-1-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan. mkomasa@juntendo.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0864-0657
Motoyuki YuasaDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, 2-1-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan.
Yoshihisa ShirayamaFaculty of International Liberal Arts, Juntendo University, 2-1-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan.
Miho SatoSchool of Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nagasaki University, 1-12-4 Sakamoto, Nagasaki-city, 852-8102, Japan.
Yutaka KomasawaAtelier 514, 5-1-18 Kinuta, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo, 157-0073, Japan.
Malak AlouriDirectorate of Woman and Child Health, Ministry of Health, Prince Hamzah Bin Al Hussein Street, P.O. Box 940370, Amman, Jordan.

Funding

Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) Not applicable
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAppropriate contraceptive use remains a major health challenge in rural Jordan. The Japan International Cooperation Agency implemented a project aimed at enhancing the capacity of village health centers (VHCs) to improve the quality and quantity of family planning (FP) services in rural Jordan in 2016-2018. Facility- and community-based approaches were integrated into the interventions. We evaluated the project's impacts on contraceptive behaviors and the effectiveness of the two approaches.

methodsWe used a difference-in-differences analysis based on the project baseline and endline surveys, and logistic regression analysis to assess associations between eight primary outcomes and three secondary outcomes (impacts). The unit of intervention was five target VHCs; the unit of analysis was currently married women of reproductive age (15-49 years) in five intervention and five control villages.

resultsOverall, 2061 married women participated; 83.8% were in need of FP. Compared with the control villages, significant effects, ranging from + 0.4% points (pp) to + 11.5 pp., were observed in the intervention villages for six primary outcomes in these categories: increasing the use of FP services at VHCs, participation in health promotion activities, and changing the sources of reproductive health information. There was a trend toward improved secondary outcomes in the intervention villages, but no significant differences were observed between the intervention and control villages regarding modern contraceptive use (mCU; + 4.3 pp), traditional contraceptive use (tCU; - 0.5 pp), and spousal agreement on contraception (+ 5.1 pp). mCU was positively associated with five primary outcomes: obtaining contraceptives at VHCs [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 3.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.26-9.40], education sessions at VHC (AOR 7.41, 95% CI 1.60-34.39), health activities in communities (AOR 7.41, 95% CI 3.28-16.78), counseling by private doctor/clinic (AOR 0.62, 95% CI 0.40-0.97), and information gained through TV (AOR 0.50, 95% CI 0.32-0.76). Spousal agreement on contraception showed similar positive trends. tCU was associated only with TV.

conclusionsThe project had impacts on increased mCU and husbands' perception of contraception in rural Jordan. The integration of facility- and community-based approaches may be effective in shifting from tCU to mCU in other rural areas.

Indexed as

Rural PopulationAdolescentAdultContraception BehaviorFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHealth Services ResearchHumansJordanMarital StatusMiddle AgedRural Health ServicesYoung AdultCommunity-based approachDifference-in-differences analysisEvaluationFamily planningImpactJapan International Cooperation AgencyJordanModern contraceptives

Identifiers

PMID31664981
PMCPMC6820982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.