Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31664918›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2019

Resident and staff perspectives of person-centered climate in nursing homes: a cross-sectional study.

Yunxia Yang, Hui Li, Lily Dongxia Xiao, Wenhui Zhang, Menghan Xia, Hui Feng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Communication Disparities between Nursing Home Team Members.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  10. Qualitative Study of the Implementation and Potential of a Social Intervention at Nursing Homes in Denmark.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Yunxia YangXiangya Nursing School, Central South University, 172 Tong Zi Po Road, Changsha, 410013, Hunan, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1763-1365
Hui LiNursing Department, Ophthalmology Department, The third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Xiangya Nursing School of Central South University, 172 Tong Zi Po Road, Changsha, 410013, Hunan, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5362-7155
Lily Dongxia XiaoXiangya Nursing School, Central South University, 172 Tong Zi Po Road, Changsha, 410013, Hunan, China. lily.xiao@flinders.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-4631-2443
Wenhui ZhangSchool of Nursing and Department of Statistics & Data Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, 1710 Red River Street, Austin, TX, 78701, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9328-2315
Menghan XiaXiangya Nursing School, Central South University, 172 Tong Zi Po Road, Changsha, 410013, Hunan, China.
Hui FengHealth Nursing Research Center, Xiangya Nursing School of Central South University, 172 Tong Zi Po Road, Changsha, 410013, Hunan, China. feng.hui@csu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0001-6930-4780
Central South University · CNThe University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPerson-centered care is widely recognized as a gold standard and is based on a supportive psychosocial climate for both residents and staff in nursing homes. Residents and staff may have different perspectives as to whether the climate in which they interact is person-centered, perhaps due to their different expectations of the nursing home environment and the provision of care services. The aim of this study was to explore and compare resident and staff perspectives of person-centered climate in aged care nursing homes.

methodsThis is a descriptive cross-sectional study using a cluster random sampling method. The study collected data in 2016 from residents (n = 251) and nursing staff (n = 249) in 23 nursing homes using a Person-centered Climate Questionnaire-Patient version and Person-centered Climate-Staff version. T-tests for independent-samples were used to compare scores ranked by nursing staff and residents.

resultsThe mean scores of 'A climate of safety' subscale and 'A climate of everydayness' subscale rated by residents were significantly lower than those rated by nursing staff. The mean scores of 'A climate of hospitality' rated by residents were very low among the three subscales, an indicator of the need to improve a more home-like environment for residents. Residents in larger size nursing homes showed a higher score of person-centered climate compared with their counterparts in small size nursing homes.

conclusionsThis study reveals that the perspectives and perceptions of person-centered climate differ between residents and nursing staff. Therefore, both resident and staff perspectives should be taken into account in attempting to improve person-centered climate for better care outcomes.

Indexed as

Nurse-Patient RelationsNursing StaffPatient-Centered CarePatient PreferenceAgedAttitude of Health PersonnelCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHomes for the AgedHumansMaleNursing HomesSurveys and QuestionnairesAged careNursing homesNursing staffOlder peoplePerson-centered care

Identifiers

PMID31664918
PMCPMC6819492
OpenAlexW2982659988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.