ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2019
Impact of merging commercial breeding lines on the genetic diversity of Landrace pigs.
Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genomic diversity, inbreeding, and selection signatures in duroc, landrace, and yorkshire pigs from a long-term closed breeding system.Journal of applied genetics · 2026Article
- Pig Genome Editing for Agriculture: Achievements and Challenges.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Whole-genome resequencing reveals genetic differentiation and selection signatures among wild, local and commercial duck populations.Animal bioscience · 2025Article
- Evolution under intensive industrial breeding: skull size and shape comparison between historic and modern pig lineages.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
- Selection and Drift: A Comparison between Historic and Recent Dutch Friesian Cattle and Recent Holstein Friesian Using WGS Data.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Genomic analysis of the rare British Lop pig and identification of distinctive genomic markers.PloS one · 2022Article
- Opportunities of Genomics for the Use of Semen Cryo-Conserved in Gene Banks.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Review
- Analysis of Homozygous-by-Descent (HBD) Segments for Purebred and Crossbred Pigs in Russia.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- A comparative analysis of SLA-DRB1 genetic diversity in Colombian (creoles and commercial line) and worldwide swine populations.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Mitochondrial DNA Diversity in Large White Pigs in Russia.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe pig breeding industry has undergone a large number of mergers in the past decades. Various commercial lines were merged or discontinued, which is expected to reduce the genetic diversity of the pig species. The objective of the current study was to investigate the genetic diversity of different former Dutch Landrace breeding lines and quantify their relationship with the current Dutch Landrace breed that originated from these lines.
resultsPrincipal component analysis clearly divided the former Landrace lines into two main clusters, which are represented by Norwegian/Finnish Landrace lines and Dutch Landrace lines. Structure analysis revealed that each of the lines that are present in the Dutch Gene bank has a unique genetic identity. The current Dutch Landrace breed shows a high level of admixture and is closely related to the six former lines. The Dumeco N-line, which is conserved in the Dutch Gene bank, is poorly represented in the current Dutch Landrace. All seven lines (the six former and the current line) contribute almost equally to the genetic diversity of the Dutch Landrace breed. As expected, the current Dutch Landrace breed comprises only a small proportion of unique genetic diversity that was not present in the other lines. The genetic diversity level, as measured by Eding's core set method, was equal to 0.89 for the current Dutch Landrace breed, whereas total genetic diversity across the seven lines, measured by the same method, was equal to 0.99.
conclusionsThe current Dutch Landrace breed shows a high level of admixture and is closely related to the six former Dutch Landrace lines. Merging of commercial Landrace lines has reduced the genetic diversity of the Landrace population in the Netherlands, although a large proportion of the original variation is maintained. Thus, our recommendation is to conserve breeding lines in a gene bank before they are merged.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.