Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31664749›Full record

ReviewTraffic (Copenhagen, Denmark)2020

Digestive exophagy: Phagocyte digestion of objects too large for phagocytosis.

Frederick R Maxfield, Valeria C Barbosa-Lorenzi, Rajesh K Singh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Traffic (Copenhagen, Denmark), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Quantifying the fitness contribution of phagocytosis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Frederick R MaxfieldDepartment of Biochemistry, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0003-4396-8866
Valeria C Barbosa-LorenziDepartment of Biochemistry, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Rajesh K SinghDepartment of Biochemistry, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.

Funding

Macrophage-Lipoprotein InteractionsR01HL093324 · NHLBI · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI MAXFIELD, FREDERICK R. · 2009 to 2025
$6.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL093324NHLBI NIH HHS R01-HL093324
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mammalian phagocytes carry out several essential functions, including killing and digesting infectious organisms, clearing denatured proteins, removing dead cells and removing several types of debris from the extracellular space. Many of these functions involve phagocytosis, the engulfment of a target in a specialized endocytic process and then fusion of the new phagosome with lysosomes. Phagocytes such as macrophages can phagocytose targets that are several micrometers in diameter (eg, dead cells), but in some cases they encounter much larger objects. We have studied two such examples in some detail: large deposits of lipoproteins such as those in the wall of blood vessels associated with atherosclerosis, and dead adipocytes, which are dozens of micrometers in diameter. We describe a process, which we call digestive exophagy, in which macrophages create a tight seal in contact with the target, acidify the sealed zone and secrete lysosomal contents into the contact zone. By this process, hydrolysis by lysosomal enzymes occurs in a compartment that is outside the cell. We compare this process to the well characterized digestion of bone by osteoclasts, and we point out key similarities and differences.

Indexed as

PhagocytesPhagocytosisAnimalsDigestionLysosomesMacrophagesPhagosomesexocytosisexophagylysosomesmacrophagesphagocytosis

Identifiers

PMID31664749
PMCPMC7050189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.