Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31664623›Full record

ArticleCommunity mental health journal2020

The Adaptation and Feasibility of Narrative Enhancement and Cognitive Therapy (NECT) for Late-Onset Psychosis.

Elaine Y N Ching, Lucy Smyth, Tanisha De Souza, Georgina Charlesworth

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Community mental health journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05130853 (Social Cognition Individualized Activities Lab), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05130853 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Social Cognition Individualized Activities Lab (SoCIAL) for the Training of Social Cognition and Narrative Enhancement in Patients With Schizophrenia: A Randomized Controlled Study to Assess Efficacy and Generalization to Real-life Functioning

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Campania Luigi VanvitelliRan2021 to 2022Enrolled48ConditionsSchizophrenia, Schizo Affective DisorderArmsSocial Skills and Neurocognitive Individualized Training (SoCIAL), Treatmment-as-usual
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Elaine Y N ChingResearch Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, Room 436, 4th Floor, 1-19 Torrington Place, Gower Street, London, WC1E 7HB, UK. elaine.ching1@nhs.net.ORCID 0000-0002-2279-4898
Lucy SmythResearch Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, Room 436, 4th Floor, 1-19 Torrington Place, Gower Street, London, WC1E 7HB, UK.
Tanisha De SouzaResearch and Development, North East London NHS Foundation Trust, Goodmayes Hospital, 157 Barley Lane Ilford, London, IG3 8XJ, UK.
Georgina CharlesworthResearch Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, Room 436, 4th Floor, 1-19 Torrington Place, Gower Street, London, WC1E 7HB, UK.
North East London NHS Foundation Trust · GBBarnet Enfield and Haringey Mental Health Trust · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study is to adapt and feasibility test the narrative component of Narrative Enhancement and Cognitive Therapy (NECT) for late-onset psychosis. This study followed the development and feasibility phases of the Medical Research Council framework. The original NECT intervention was adapted based on consultations with service users, experts, and clinicians. The evaluation of the feasibility test of the adapted intervention was guided by Orsmond and Cohn (Occup Particip Health 35(3):169-177, 2015)'s model for feasibility studies. The final adaptations consist of language, readability, and delivery. The adapted intervention was tested for feasibility and acceptability with one group of five patients recruited from a National Health Service (NHS) Trust in UK Results were mixed in participant outcomes and a likelihood of acceptability of the intervention. This indicates the need for a larger scale feasibility test to explore the identified benefits and challenges of implementing NECT in NHS or community settings for late-onset psychosis.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyPsychotic DisordersFeasibility StudiesHumansNarrationState MedicineLate-onset psychosisNarrative therapyPsychological intervention

Identifiers

PMID31664623
PMCPMC6971141
OpenAlexW2982507848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.