Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31664583›Full record

Observational studyZeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie2019

A pilot observational study to analyze (in)activity and reasons for sedentary behavior of cognitively impaired geriatric acute inpatients.

Nacera Belala, Carolin Maier, Patrick Heldmann, Michael Schwenk, Clemens Becker

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Objective and subjective measurement of sedentary behavior in human adults: A toolkit.American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nacera BelalaNetwork Aging Research, Heidelberg University, Bergheimer Str. 20, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany. belala@nar.uni-heidelberg.de.
Carolin MaierDepartment of Geriatrics and Clinic for Geriatric Rehabilitation, Robert-Bosch Hospital, Stuttgart, Germany.
Patrick HeldmannNetwork Aging Research, Heidelberg University, Bergheimer Str. 20, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany.
Michael SchwenkNetwork Aging Research, Heidelberg University, Bergheimer Str. 20, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany.
Clemens BeckerDepartment of Geriatrics and Clinic for Geriatric Rehabilitation, Robert-Bosch Hospital, Stuttgart, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveMobility decline and worsening of the cognitive status are all too often the result of acute hospital treatment in older patients. This is particularly pronounced in patients with pre-existing cognitive impairment. This study strived to analyze the routines of geriatric acute care and identify reasons and triggers for sedentary behavior during acute hospitalization of cognitively impaired inpatients. METHODS AND PATIENTS: A sample of 20 moderately cognitively impaired geriatric inpatients (average age 84 years) were recruited on an acute care ward. Information on persons attending the patient, daytime, location, context, patient's activity behavior and difficulty of action were collected by behavioral mapping over a period of 35 1‑min timeslots and extrapolated to a period of 525 min. Routines were further analyzed via semi-structured interviews with five healthcare professionals (HCP).

resultsRelevant relations between various categorical and ordinal variables, such as patients' activity behavior, persons attending the patient, daytime, location, difficulty of action and contextual factors were found. Extrapolated data showed that patients spent 396.9 min (75%) in their room, 342.0 min (65%) were spent alone and 236.2 min (45%) lying in bed. The time patients spent alone was grossly underestimated by HCP.

conclusionTime spent without company, lacking meaningful activities and continuous bedridden periods due to missing demands to leave the room might have led to time spent inactive and alone. These seem to be strong predictors for sedentariness. Routines of acute care should be reorganized to increase physical activity and thereby reduce sedentary behavior of this patient group.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingSedentary BehaviorAgedAged, 80 and overCognitive DysfunctionHospitalizationHumansInpatientsPilot ProjectsAcute careCognitive impairmentFunctional declineHospitalizationPhysical activity

Identifiers

PMID31664583
PMCPMC6820593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.