Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31664547›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology experimental2019

Reproducibility of semiautomated body composition segmentation of abdominal computed tomography: a multiobserver study.

Lisa Jannicke Kjønigsen, Magnus Harneshaug, Ann-Monica Fløtten, Lena Korsmo Karterud, Kent Petterson, Grethe Skjolde, Heidi B Eggesbø, Harald Weedon-Fekjær, Hege Berg Henriksen, Peter M Lauritzen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology experimental, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lisa Jannicke KjønigsenDivision of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Magnus HarneshaugThe Centre for Old Age Psychiatry Research, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Ottestad, Norway.
Ann-Monica FløttenDivision of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Lena Korsmo KarterudDivision of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Kent PettersonDivision of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Grethe SkjoldeDivision of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Heidi B EggesbøDivision of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Harald Weedon-FekjærOslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Research Support Services, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Hege Berg HenriksenDivision of Clinical Nutrition, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Peter M LauritzenDivision of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. peter.m.lauritzen@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2309-7218
Oslo University Hospital · NOUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSegmentation of computed tomography (CT) images provides quantitative data on body tissue composition, which may greatly impact the development and progression of diseases such as type 2 diabetes mellitus and cancer. We aimed to evaluate the inter- and intraobserver variation of semiautomated segmentation, to assess whether multiple observers may interchangeably perform this task.

methodsAnonymised, unenhanced, single mid-abdominal CT images were acquired from 132 subjects from two previous studies. Semiautomated segmentation was performed using a proprietary software package. Abdominal muscle compartment (AMC), inter- and intramuscular adipose tissue (IMAT), visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) were identified according to pre-established attenuation ranges. The segmentation was performed by four observers: an oncology resident with extensive training and three radiographers with a 2-week training programme. To assess interobserver variation, segmentation of each CT image was performed individually by two or more observers. To assess intraobserver variation, three of the observers did repeated segmentations of the images. The distribution of variation between subjects, observers and random noise was estimated by a mixed effects model. Inter- and intraobserver correlation was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

resultsFor all four tissue compartments, the observer variations were far lower than random noise by factors ranging from 1.6 to 3.6 and those between subjects by factors ranging from 7.3 to 186.1. All interobserver ICC was ≥ 0.938, and all intraobserver ICC was ≥ 0.996.

conclusionsBody composition segmentation showed a very low level of operator dependability. Multiple observers may interchangeably perform this task with highly reproducible results.

Indexed as

Body CompositionAbdomenAdultHumansMaleMiddle AgedObserver VariationReproducibility of ResultsTomography, X-Ray ComputedAbdominal fatBody compositionObserver variationSkeletal muscleTomography (X-ray computed)

Identifiers

PMID31664547
PMCPMC6820626
OpenAlexW2982400316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.