Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31664469›Full record

ReviewSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2020

Cervical pedicle agenesis: case report and bibliographic review.

A J Sarotto, J Rosado Pardo, S Fossa Riglos, M Besse

Abstract readCase ReportsReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A J SarottoMembers of the Spine Division, Orthopedic Section of Carlos G. Durand Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2199-5524
J Rosado PardoMembers of the Spine Division, Orthopedic Section of Carlos G. Durand Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8467-3453
S Fossa RiglosMembers of the Spine Division, Orthopedic Section of Carlos G. Durand Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
M BesseMembers of the Spine Division, Orthopedic Section of Carlos G. Durand Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina. m.besse@hotmail.com.ar.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4388-1384
El Hospital General de Agudos Carlos G. Durand · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The posterior arch defects of the cervical spine are rare, and they arise out of deviations of the normal intrauterine development of the spine (4-8 weeks of development). The defects range from a cleft to the total agenesis of the posterior arch, with a reported prevalence of 4% and 0.15%, respectively. The pedicle agenesis is most frequently found in C6. A diagnosis is usually made after a traumatic incident in a previously asymptomatic patient. 35% of a patient's current symptoms are associated with instability or translation of the impaired vertebral segments like headaches, chronic pain, and neurological impairment. The clinical and radiological findings of a patient with an unusual and complex cervical spine malformation are reported. These are rare entities and seldom require surgical treatment. It is imperative for spine surgeons to be aware of these anatomical abnormalities to avoid misinterpretation and thus inappropriate treatment, particularly in acute trauma patients.

Indexed as

Spinal FusionBone PlatesCervical VertebraeFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeckTomography, X-Ray ComputedTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAbsent pediclesCervical spineCongenital anomaliesPedicle agenesis

Identifiers

PMID31664469
OpenAlexW2982650275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.