ReviewDer Internist2020
[Valvular heart disease in patients with chronic kidney disease].
Review in Der Internist, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Valvular heart disease is a common comorbidity in patients with impaired renal function, especially in those with end-stage renal disease undergoing dialysis. Sclerosis and calcification of the heart valves and the valve ring are particularly relevant in the etiology of the diseases. These typically occur at the aortic and mitral valves and can lead to both insufficiency and stenosis of the affected valve. In the current guidelines of the European Society for Cardiology published in 2017, surgical treatment remains the standard of care for most forms of severe valvular heart disease; however, the presence of chronic kidney disease impairs clinical outcomes and is associated with higher mortality rates when compared to patients with preserved renal function. Catheter-based treatment options have emerged as an effective and safe alternative for patients >75 years and/or with increased surgical risk. Consequently, in patients with appropriate anatomy and elevated risk, interventional treatment options should also be discussed in the heart team.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.