Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31664443›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2019

Epidemiologic Trends in Clostridioides difficile Infections in a Regional Community Hospital Network.

Nicholas A Turner, Steven C Grambow, Christopher W Woods, Vance G Fowler, Rebekah W Moehring, Deverick J Anderson, Sarah S Lewis

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Reexamining Novel Risk Factors for Community-AcquiredOpen forum infectious diseases · 2026
    Article
  3. Observational
  4. Variety ofGerms · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Epidemiologic validation of the National Healthcare Safety Network's updatedInfection control and hospital epidemiology · 2025
    Article
  10. The Global Burden ofInfectious disease reports · 2025
    Review
  11. Microbial genomics · 2025
    Article
  12. Beyond Antibiotics: What the Future Holds.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Mortality Attributable toMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024
    Article
  15. The conneXion between sex and immune responses.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2024
    Review
  16. "Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The Next Generation: Mentoring and Diversity in the Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2023
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nicholas A TurnerDivision of Infectious Diseases, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Steven C GrambowDuke University, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Durham, North Carolina.
Christopher W WoodsDivision of Infectious Diseases, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Vance G FowlerDivision of Infectious Diseases, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Rebekah W MoehringDivision of Infectious Diseases, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Deverick J AndersonDivision of Infectious Diseases, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Sarah S LewisDivision of Infectious Diseases, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

Funding

Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group (ARLG)UM1AI104681 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Vance G. Fowler, Henry F HENRY CHAMBERS · 2013 to 2026
$180.8M
Mentoring Patient Oriented Research in Antibiotic-Resistant BacteriaK24AI093969 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI FOWLER, VANCE G. · 2011 to 2020
$1.6M
AHRQ HHS K08 HS023866NIAID NIH HHS K24 AI093969NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI104681
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) remains a leading cause of health care facility-associated infection. A greater understanding of the regional epidemiologic profile of CDI could inform targeted prevention strategies. Objectives: To assess trends in incidence of health care facility-associated and community-acquired CDI among hospitalized patients over time and to conduct a subanalysis of trends in the NAP1 strain of CDI over time. Design, Setting, and Participants: This long-term multicenter cohort study reviewed records of patients (N = 2 025 678) admitted to a network of 43 regional community hospitals primarily in the southeastern United States from January 1, 2013, through December 31, 2017. Generalized linear mixed-effects models were used to adjust for potential clustering within facilities and changing test method (nucleic acid amplification testing or toxin enzyme immunoassay) over time. Main Outcomes and Measures: Clostridioides difficile infection incidence rates were counted as cases per 1000 admissions for community-acquired and total CDI cases or cases per 10 000 patient-days for health care facility-associated CDI. Long-term trends in the proportion of cases acquired in the community and in NAP1 strain incidence were also evaluated. Results: A total of 2 025 678 admissions and 21 254 CDI cases were included (12 678 [59.6%] female; median [interquartile range] age, 69 [55-80] years). Median (interquartile range) total CDI incidence increased slightly from 7.9 (3.5-12.4) cases per 1000 admissions in 2013 to 9.3 (4.9-13.7) cases per 1000 admissions in 2017. After adjustment, the overall incidence of health care facility-associated CDI declined (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.995; 95% CI, 0.990-0.999; P = .03), whereas insufficient evidence was found for either an increase or a decrease in community-acquired CDI (IRR, 1.004; 95% CI, 0.999-1.009; P = .14). The proportion of cases classified as community acquired increased over time from a mean (SD) of 0.49 (0.28) in 2013 to 0.61 (0.26) in 2017 (odds ratio, 1.010 per month; 95% CI, 1.006-1.015; P < .001). Rates of the NAP1 strain of CDI varied widely between facilities, with no statistically significant change in NAP1 strain incidence over time in the community setting (IRR, 1.007; 95% CI, 0.994-1.021) or health care facility setting (IRR, 1.011; 95% CI, 0.990-1.032). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings suggest that, despite the modest improvement in health care facility-associated CDI rates, a better understanding of community-acquired CDI incidence is needed for future infection prevention efforts.

Indexed as

Hospitals, CommunityAgedAged, 80 and overClostridioides difficileClostridium InfectionsCommunity-Acquired InfectionsCross InfectionFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedNorth Carolina

Identifiers

PMID31664443
PMCPMC6824221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.