Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31664418›Full record

ArticleClinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2019

Changes in the intestinal microbiota of superobese patients after bariatric surgery.

Denis Pajecki, Lea Campos de Oliveira, Ester Cerdeira Sabino, Marcela de Souza-Basqueira, Anna Carolina Batista Dantas, Gabriel Cairo Nunes, Roberto de Cleva, Marco Aurélio Santo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The impact of gastrointestinal dysmotility on the aerodigestive microbiome of pediatric lung transplant recipients.The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation · 2021
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Denis PajeckiUnidade de Cirurgia Bariatrica e Metabolica, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR.ORCID 0000-0002-0898-9285
Lea Campos de OliveiraLaboratorio de Medicina Laboratorial (LIM03), Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR.ORCID 0000-0002-7380-7548
Ester Cerdeira SabinoDepartamento de Molestias Infecciosas, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR.ORCID 0000-0003-2623-5126
Marcela de Souza-BasqueiraLaboratorio de Medicina Laboratorial (LIM03), Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR.ORCID 0000-0002-5590-5646
Anna Carolina Batista DantasUnidade de Cirurgia Bariatrica e Metabolica, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR.ORCID 0000-0001-9505-6784
Gabriel Cairo NunesUnidade de Cirurgia Bariatrica e Metabolica, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR.ORCID 0000-0001-6761-0194
Roberto de ClevaUnidade de Cirurgia Bariatrica e Metabolica, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR.ORCID 0000-0001-8673-9014
Marco Aurélio SantoUnidade de Cirurgia Bariatrica e Metabolica, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR.ORCID 0000-0002-7813-6210

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe gut microbiota is associated with obesity and weight loss after bariatric surgery and has been related to its changing pattern. Exactly how the bacterial population affects weight loss and the results of surgery remain controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the intestinal microbiota of superobese patients before and after gastric bypass surgery (RYGB).

methodDNA fragments for the microbiota obtained from stool samples collected from nine superobese patients before and after bariatric surgery were sequenced using Ion Torrent.

resultsWe observed that with a mean follow-up of 15 months, patients achieved 55.9% excess weight loss (EWL). A significant population reduction in the Proteobacteria phylum (11 to 2%, p=0.0025) was observed after surgery, while no difference was seen in Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes. Further analyses performed with two specific individuals with divergent clinical outcomes showed a change in the pattern between them, with a significant increase in Firmicutes and a decrease in Bacteroidetes in the patient with less weight loss (%EWL 50.79 vs. 61.85).

conclusionsRYGB affects the microbiota of superobese patients, with a significant reduction in Proteobacteria in patients with different weight loss, showing that different bacteria may contribute to the process.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryGastrointestinal MicrobiomeWeight LossAdolescentAdultFecesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedObesity, MorbidRNA, Ribosomal, 16SYoung AdultRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID31664418
PMCPMC6807688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.