Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31664318›Full record

ArticleArquivos brasileiros de cardiologia2020

Aortic Arch Calcification on Routine Chest Radiography is Strongly and Independently Associated with Non-Dipper Blood Pressure Pattern.

Adem Adar, Orhan Onalan, Fahri Cakan, Ertan Akbay, Ekrem Karakaya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Adem AdarKarabuk University Faculty of Medicine - Cardiology, Karabuk - Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-2404-6447
Orhan OnalanKarabuk University Faculty of Medicine - Cardiology, Karabuk - Turkey.
Fahri CakanKarabuk University Faculty of Medicine - Cardiology, Karabuk - Turkey.
Ertan AkbayKarabuk University Faculty of Medicine - Cardiology, Karabuk - Turkey.
Ekrem KarakayaKarabuk University Faculty of Medicine - Cardiology, Karabuk - Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNon-dipper blood pressure (NDBP) is one of the important causes of hypertension-related target organ damage and future cardiovascular events. Currently, there is no practical tool to predict NDBP pattern.

objectivesThe aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between aortic arch calcification (AAC) on chest radiography and NDBP pattern.

methodsAll patients referred for ambulatory BP monitoring test were approached for the study participation. NDBP was defined as the reduction of ≤10% in nighttime systolic BP as compared to the daytime values. AAC was evaluated with chest radiography and inter-observer agreement was analyzed by using kappa statistics. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to assess the association of AAC and NDBP pattern. A 2-tailed p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

resultsA total of 406 patients (median age: 51.3) were included. Of these, 261(64%) had NDBP pattern. Overall, the prevalence of AAC was 230 (57%). Non-dipper group had significantly higher prevalence of AAC (70% vs. 33%, p < 0.0001) as compared to the dipper group. Presence of AAC was a strong and independent predictor of NDBP pattern (OR 3.919, 95%CI 2.39 to 6.42) in multivariate analysis.

conclusionsPresence of AAC on plain chest radiography is strongly and independently associated with the presence of NDBP pattern.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAortic DiseasesBlood PressureBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryCircadian RhythmFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiography, ThoracicRisk FactorsSeverity of Illness IndexVascular Calcification

Identifiers

PMID31664318
PMCPMC7025298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.