Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31664313›Full record

ArticleMemorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz2019

Where, when, and how the diagnosis of human visceral leishmaniasis is defined: answers from the Brazilian control program.

João Gabriel Guimarães Luz, Amanda Gabriela de Carvalho, Danilo Bueno Naves, João Victor Leite Dias, Cor Jesus Fernandes Fontes

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

João Gabriel Guimarães LuzUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Instituto de Ciências Exatas e Naturais, Curso de Medicina, Rondonópolis, MT, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0274-732X
Amanda Gabriela de CarvalhoUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Instituto de Ciências Exatas e Naturais, Curso de Medicina, Rondonópolis, MT, Brasil.
Danilo Bueno NavesUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Instituto de Ciências Exatas e Naturais, Curso de Medicina, Rondonópolis, MT, Brasil.
João Victor Leite DiasUniversidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri, Faculdade de Medicina, Teófilo Otoni, MG, Brasil.
Cor Jesus Fernandes FontesUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Faculdade de Medicina, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Cuiabá, MT, Brasil.
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso · BRUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul · BRUniversidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTimely diagnosis is recommended by the Brazilian Visceral Leishmaniasis (VL) Surveillance and Control Program to reduce case fatality. Attempts at assessing this topic in Brazil are scarce.

objectiveThis study aimed to describe where, when, and how the diagnosis of VL has been performed in a Brazilian endemic setting.

methodsData of all autochthonous cases confirmed between 2011 and 2016 (N = 81) were recorded. The care-seeking itinerary until the confirmation of VL diagnosis was assessed among 57 patients.

findingsThe majority of VL cases (79.1%) were reported by referral hospitals. The patients mainly sought primary health care centres at the onset of symptoms. However, they had to visit seven health services on average to achieve a confirmed diagnosis. The time from the onset of symptoms to the diagnosis of VL (TD) ranged from 1-212 (median, 25) days. The TD was longer among adult patients. There was a direct correlation between the patient's age and TD (r = 0.22; p = 0.047) and a higher occurrence of deaths due to the disease among older patients (p = 0.002). Almost all the patients (98.9%) underwent laboratory investigation, and the VL diagnosis was mainly confirmed based on clinical-laboratory criteria (92.6%). Positive results for the indirect fluorescence antibody test (22.7%) and parasitological examination plus rk39-based immunochromatographic tests (21.3%) were commonly employed. MAIN

conclusionsVL diagnosis was predominantly conducted in hospitals with a long TD and wide application of serology. These findings may support measures focused on early diagnosis, including a greater involvement of the primary health care system.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBrazilChildChild, PreschoolChromatography, AffinityDelivery of Health CareFemaleFluorescent Antibody Technique, IndirectHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLeishmaniasis, VisceralMaleRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID31664313
PMCPMC6821129
OpenAlexW2982439640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.