ReviewModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2020
Diagnosis of T-cell lymphoid proliferations of the skin: putting all the pieces together.
Review in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Lymphomatoid papulosis: a practical review for pathologists.Journal of pathology and translational medicine · 2026Article
- Chemokine Networks in Cutaneous T Cell Lymphoma: Tumor Microenvironment Remodeling and Therapeutic Targets.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
- The Evaluation of Skin Infiltration in Mycosis Fungoides/Sézary Syndrome Using the High-Frequency Ultrasonography.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- From Morphology to Gene Expression Profiling in Mycosis Fungoides: Is It Still a Diagnostic Challenge?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Histopathological Patterns in Mycosis Fungoides: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of skin cancer · 2025Article
- Diagnosis of Early Mycosis Fungoides.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The spectrum of T-cell lymphoid proliferations of the skin varies from indolent to highly aggressive diseases and therefore an accurate pathological diagnosis is paramount. Integration of clinical, histopathological, immunohistochemical, and molecular findings is of crucial importance in the evaluation of these processes. In this article, we discuss selected situations where difficulty may arise for the pathologist evaluating this type of skin biopsies, such as: the diagnosis of early (patch stage) mycosis fungoides, the distinction of mycosis fungoides with large cell transformation from primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma, the recognition of new histopathological patterns of lymphomatoid papulosis and the entities they mimic, the evaluation of primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma with expression of markers suggestive of systemic origin (such as ALK), the awareness of the wide range of clinical and pathological presentations of hydroa vacciniforme-like EBV-positive T-cell lymphoproliferative disorders, the evaluation of cases of primary cutaneous γδ T-cell lymphoma showing predominantly epidermotropic pattern of growth, and the correct interpretation of findings seen in indolent proliferations such as primary cutaneous acral CD8-positive T-cell lymphoma and primary cutaneous small/medium size CD4 + T-cell lymphoproliferative disorder.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.