ArticleNature communications2019
Goal congruency dominates reward value in accounting for behavioral and neural correlates of value-based decision-making.
Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Complementary and opponent value signals in the human brain support choosing the best and avoiding the worst.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Neural representations of dynamical state and trait impulsivity in individuals at risk for internet gaming disorder.Molecular psychiatry · 2026Article
- Dopamine Boosts Motivation for Prosocial Effort in Parkinson's Disease.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026Article
- Rejection-based choices discourage people from opting out of voting.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Distinct contributions of prefrontal, parietal, and cingulate signals to exploratory decisions.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Misspecified models create the appearance of adaptive control during value-based choice.Communications psychology · 2026Article
- On the origin of the reward function: Exploring the role of conditioned reinforcement and social learning.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2025Review
- Functions of the posterior cingulate cortex and default network.Current opinion in behavioral sciences · 2025Article
- Mutual inclusivity improves decision-making by smoothing out choice's competitive edge.Nature human behaviour · 2025Article
- Distinct neural computations scale the violation of expected reward and emotion in social transgressions.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Considering What We Know and What We Don't Know: Expectations and Confidence Guide Value Integration in Value-Based Decision-Making.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2025Article
- Decision makers consider all options in choice triplets.PloS one · 2025Article
- Context changes retrieval of prospective outcomes during decision deliberation.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2024Article
- Latent Learning Progress Drives Autonomous Goal Selection in Human Reinforcement Learning.Advances in neural information processing systems · 2024Article
- Common neural choice signals can emerge artefactually amid multiple distinct value signals.Nature human behaviour · 2024Article
- Article
- Goal commitment is supported by vmPFC through selective attention.Nature human behaviour · 2024Article
- Dissociable Contributions of the Medial Parietal Cortex to Recognition Memory.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024Article
- Mutual inclusivity improves decision-making by smoothing out choice's competitive edge.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
When choosing between options, whether menu items or career paths, we can evaluate how rewarding each one will be, or how congruent it is with our current choice goal (e.g., to point out the best option or the worst one.). Past decision-making research interpreted findings through the former lens, but in these experiments the most rewarding option was always most congruent with the task goal (choosing the best option). It is therefore unclear to what extent expected reward vs. goal congruency can account for choice value findings. To deconfound these two variables, we performed three behavioral studies and an fMRI study in which the task goal varied between identifying the best vs. the worst option. Contrary to prevailing accounts, we find that goal congruency dominates choice behavior and neural activity. We separately identify dissociable signals of expected reward. Our findings call for a reinterpretation of previous research on value-based choice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.