Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31663609›Full record

ReviewFEBS letters2019

Take the shortcut - direct conversion of somatic cells into induced neural stem cells and their biomedical applications.

Anita Erharter, Sandra Rizzi, Jerome Mertens, Frank Edenhofer

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in FEBS letters, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Reporter Alleles in hiPSCs: Visual Cues on Development and Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. The roles and applications of neural stem cells in spinal cord injury repair.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Stem Cell Therapies for Progressive Multiple Sclerosis.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Combination of In Situ Lcn2 pRNA-RNAi Nanotherapeutics and iNSC Transplantation Ameliorates Experimental SCI in Mice.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anita ErharterDepartment of Molecular Biology & CMBI, Genomics, Stem Cell Biology & Regenerative Medicine, Leopold-Franzens-University Innsbruck, Austria.
Sandra RizziDepartment of Molecular Biology & CMBI, Genomics, Stem Cell Biology & Regenerative Medicine, Leopold-Franzens-University Innsbruck, Austria.
Jerome MertensDepartment of Molecular Biology & CMBI, Genomics, Stem Cell Biology & Regenerative Medicine, Leopold-Franzens-University Innsbruck, Austria.
Frank EdenhoferDepartment of Molecular Biology & CMBI, Genomics, Stem Cell Biology & Regenerative Medicine, Leopold-Franzens-University Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-6489-714X
Innsbruck Medical University · AT

Funding

Austrian Federal Ministry of Education, Science and Research (BMBWF)Austrian Science Fund I 3029-B30Austrian Science Fund FWF I 3029EU through the ERA-NET E-RARE and JPND (MADGIC) research program
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Second-generation reprogramming of somatic cells directly into the cell type of interest avoids induction of pluripotency and subsequent cumbersome differentiation procedures. Several recent studies have reported direct conversion of human somatic cells into stably proliferating induced neural stem cells (iNSCs). Importantly, iNSCs are easier, faster, and more cost-efficient to generate than induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), and also have a higher level of clinical safety. Stably, self-renewing iNSCs can be derived from different cellular sources, such as skin fibroblasts and peripheral blood mononuclear cells, and readily differentiate into neuronal and glial lineages that are indistinguishable from their iPSC-derived counterparts or from NSCs isolated from primary tissues. This review focuses on the derivation and characterization of iNSCs and their biomedical applications. We first outline different approaches to generate iNSCs and then discuss the underlying molecular mechanisms. Finally, we summarize the preclinical validation of iNSCs to highlight that these cells are promising targets for disease modeling, autologous cell therapy, and precision medicine.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationCellular ReprogrammingFibroblastsHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsNeural Stem CellsNeuronscell therapycellular reprogrammingdirect conversiondisease modelinginduced neural stem cellsinduced pluripotent stem cellsneuronal cellsregionalizationtransdifferentiationtransplantation

Identifiers

PMID31663609
PMCPMC6916337
OpenAlexW2982620782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.