ArticleJournal of neurotrauma2020
Functional Status Examination Yields Higher Measurement Precision of Functional Limitations after Traumatic Injury than the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended: A Preliminary Study.
Article in Journal of neurotrauma, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of Two Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended Scoring Methods on Traumatic Brain Injury Clinical Trial Design: A TRACK-TBI Study.Journal of neurotrauma · 2026Article
- 6-Month Recovery after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Older Adults: A TRACK-GERI Study.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Distinct clinical phenotypes and their neuroanatomic correlates in chronic traumatic brain injury.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Distinct clinical phenotypes and their neuroanatomic correlates in chronic traumatic brain injury.Brain communications · 2025Article
- Feasibility and Utility of a Flexible Outcome Assessment Battery for Longitudinal Traumatic Brain Injury Research: A TRACK-TBI Study.Journal of neurotrauma · 2023Article
- Traumatic brain injury: progress and challenges in prevention, clinical care, and research.The Lancet. Neurology · 2022Review
- Improving the Precision of the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended Using Item Response Theory: A TRACK-TBI Study.Journal of neurotrauma · 2022Article
- How Do Scores on the Functional Status Examination (FSE) Correspond to Scores on the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE)?Neurotrauma reports · 2022Article
- Functional Status Examination Yields Higher Measurement Precision than the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended after Moderate-to-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.Journal of neurotrauma · 2021Article
- Comparison of Four Quality of Life Inventories for Patients with Traumatic Brain Injuries and Orthopedic Injuries.Journal of neurotrauma · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE) is one of the most widely used measures of functional limitations after traumatic brain injury (TBI), and is the primary outcome measure used in clinical trials of acute TBI treatment. However, the GOSE appears insensitive to the full spectrum of TBI-related functional limitations, which may limit its potential to capture treatment effects or correlate with other variables that impact outcome. The Functional Status Examination (FSE) was designed to improve on the assessment of injury-related functional limitations using a standardized assessment and wider possible score range. The aim of this pilot study was to employ item response theory (IRT) to test the hypothesis that the FSE yields more precise estimation of functional outcome than the GOSE. Traumatically injured patients (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.