Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31663394›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of general practice2020

SERIES: eHealth in primary care. Part 2: Exploring the ethical implications of its application in primary care practice.

Sarah N Boers, Karin R Jongsma, Federica Lucivero, Jiska Aardoom, Frederike L Büchner, Martine de Vries, Persijn Honkoop, Elisa J F Houwink, Marise J Kasteleyn, Eline Meijer and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of general practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. "More" work for nurses: the ironies of eHealth.BMC health services research · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Sarah N BoersJulius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Department of Medical Humanities, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Karin R JongsmaJulius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Department of Medical Humanities, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8135-6786
Federica LuciveroEthox and Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Jiska AardoomDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Frederike L BüchnerDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8977-5344
Martine de VriesDepartment of Medical Ethics and Health Law, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Persijn HonkoopDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Elisa J F HouwinkDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Marise J KasteleynDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Eline MeijerDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Hilary PinnockUsher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Martina TeichertDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy & Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Paul van der BoogDepartment of Nephrology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Sanne van LuenenDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Rianne M J J van der KleijDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Niels H ChavannesDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Decision Making, SharedPrimary Health CareRoleDecision Support Systems, ClinicalHumansMachine LearningPersonal AutonomyPersuasive CommunicationPhysician-Patient RelationsPhysician's RolePrecision MedicineSelf-ManagementTelemedicinedigital healthdoctor–patient relationshipeHealthethicsprimary care

Identifiers

PMID31663394
PMCPMC7034078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.