Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31663257›Full record

ArticleJournal of the International AIDS Society2019

Daily and event-driven pre-exposure prophylaxis for men who have sex with men in Belgium: results of a prospective cohort measuring adherence, sexual behaviour and STI incidence.

Bea Vuylsteke, Thijs Reyniers, Irith De Baetselier, Christiana Nöstlinger, Tania Crucitti, Jozefien Buyze, Chris Kenyon, Kristien Wouters, Marie Laga

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Adherence Among Men Who Have Sex With Men: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Bea VuylstekeDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-0514-4372
Thijs ReyniersDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Irith De BaetselierDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Christiana NöstlingerDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Tania CrucittiDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Jozefien BuyzeDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Chris KenyonDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Kristien WoutersDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Marie LagaDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) is highly effective in reducing the risk for HIV infection among men who have sex with men (MSM) and may have an important impact in slowing down the HIV epidemic. Concerns remain however about low adherence, increased risk behaviour and reduced condom use when using PrEP. The aim of this study was to assess these factors prospectively among MSM using daily and event-driven PrEP in Belgium.

methodsAn open-label prospective cohort study was conducted from October 2017 to May 2018 at the Institute of Tropical Medicine, in Antwerp, Belgium. At enrolment, MSM at high risk for HIV chose between daily or event-driven PrEP. They were allowed to switch regimens or stop taking PrEP at each of their tri-monthly visits. Data were collected on an electronic case report form, web-based diary and self-administered questionnaire. Screening for HIV and other Sexually Transmitted Infections (STIs) was also performed.

resultsTwo hundred MSM were followed up for a total duration of 318 person-years. At month 18, 75.4% of the participants were on daily and 24.6% were on event-driven PrEP. The mean proportion of covered sex acts by PrEP for the complete follow-up period was 91.5% for all participants, 96.5% for daily and 67.0% for event-driven PrEP use. The number of casual and anonymous sex partners was significantly higher for daily users, as compared with event-driven users, but did not change over time. In contrast, the mean proportion of condomless receptive anal intercourse with casual and anonymous partners increased significantly during follow-up, for both daily and event-driven use (p < 0.0001 for all 4 trends). No new HIV infection was diagnosed during follow-up. The incidence of bacterial STIs was 75.4 per 100 person-years (95% CI 63.8 to 89.1). We did not detect a significant change in N. gonorrhoeae/C. trachomatis incidence over time. The incidence of hepatitis C was 2.9 per 100 person-years.

conclusionsPrEP is an effective and well adopted HIV prevention tool for MSM in Belgium. Participants adapted daily and event-driven regimens to their own needs and were able to adapt their PrEP adherence to risk exposure.

Indexed as

Medication AdherencePre-Exposure ProphylaxisSexual and Gender MinoritiesAdultAgedAnti-HIV AgentsBelgiumCohort StudiesFemaleHIV InfectionsHomosexuality, MaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesAnti-HIV AgentsadherenceBelgiumevent-drivenHIV preventionMSMPrEPSTI

Identifiers

PMID31663257
PMCPMC6819896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.